Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boards And Commissions Human Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays decision on Human Relations Commission after public comment and heated debate
Summary
Following public appeals and extended council debate, the Aurora City Council voted Aug. 25 to continue action on Ordinance 2025-73 (which would eliminate the Human Relations Commission) to a Sept. 22 meeting. Supporters urged preserving the commission; opponents cited partisanship and spending concerns.
The Aurora City Council on Aug. 25 deferred final action on Ordinance 2025-73, which would eliminate the Human Relations Commission (HRC). After two public speakers and extended council debate, a substitute motion to continue the item to the Sept. 22 council meeting passed unanimously.
Two members of the public addressed council. The first speaker, identified in the record as Aaron, described his past service on the HRC and urged council to "vote to save the Human Relations Commission," saying the commission represented a long-standing commitment to diversity and community engagement. Amy, identified as chair of the Human Relations Commission, presented budget and volunteer-value figures: she estimated the commission’s annual city allocation at about $12,000 and calculated volunteer-value contributions (meetings and events) that she said combined to roughly $18,619 annually. She told council the commission "plays a vital role in building bridges, fostering community connections, and representing Aurora's commitment to its diverse population."
Council debate was lengthy and sharply divided. Some council members echoed concerns that the commission had engaged in partisan activity, promoted a candidate event and used commission funds in ways they considered inappropriate; they cited a May 7 meeting where the HRC voted to spend funds for events and a $2,000 allocation to a nonprofit. Other council members characterized the measure as retaliatory and urged reform of bylaws and appointment practices rather than elimination.
Mayor Kaufman and Council member Bergen both proposed a compromise amendment to retain the HRC but require quarterly meetings and direct staff to return with proposed bylaw changes and appointment processes. Council member Bergen offered a substitute motion to continue the item so staff and council could prepare recommendations; that substitute was seconded and carried unanimously. The clerk announced, "The motion passes unanimously to adopt or to continue item 13 b to the September 22 council meeting."
