This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The State Board of Education heard staff explain proposed administrative rules to implement the legislature’s authorization allowing alternate teacher‑preparation organizations to operate in Alabama.
Staff said the statute gives non‑degree programs a pathway to certify candidates who already hold a college degree. The department’s draft rule would require alternate providers to document operational history or CAEP accreditation, meet minimum performance and program standards, and — critically — either require candidates to pass Alabama assessments (for content and pedagogy) or to provide an alternate assessment that is substantially aligned with Alabama standards. Staff said the department will review alternate vendor assessments and may contract a third‑party evaluator to determine whether an alternate exam (and its cut score) is equivalent to Alabama’s assessments.
Board members and staff discussed the policy tradeoffs: some alternate providers and their advocates asked the state to accept provider‑issued completion measures without an Alabama‑aligned end‑of‑program assessment; department staff and several legislators expressed concern that accepting such measures without independent alignment reviews could lower preparation standards. Several board members said they support a pathway but emphasized that students deserve an independent verification of teacher candidate knowledge and pedagogy.
Staff listed additional conditions in the draft rule: providers must document successful operation in multiple states or show CAEP accreditation; the department would require program documentation and reserves review authority over alternate assessments and cut‑score equivalency. Staff also said the department expects multiple organizations have expressed interest, including a mix of CAEP‑accredited and non‑accredited providers; exact vendor names and application details were not presented at the work session.
No formal rule adoption occurred at the work session; staff said the rules will return next month for the formal notice of intent and later for adoption under the administrative procedures timetable. Department staff said they will meet with interested providers to review any concerns about assessment equivalency.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,055 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit