Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cottage Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning panel approves 114‑unit cottage development on North Mesa
Summary
The Los Alamos Planning and Zoning Commission approved a conditional use permit for a 114‑unit built‑to‑rent cottage development on a 9.51‑acre tract in North Mesa, the county's first recognized cottage development and part of the county's strategy to expand housing supply.
LOS ALAMOS, N.M. — The Los Alamos County Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 20 approved a conditional use permit for a 114‑unit cottage development on Tract 4 of the Arbolada replat, a project the applicant described as a built‑to‑rent community with shared open space and neighborhood amenities.
The commission voted 5‑0 to approve case CUP20250001. The motion to approve was moved and seconded and roll call showed affirmative votes from Commissioners Hill, Nelson, Easton, Adler and Bruhl.
Danielle Valdez, planning manager for Los Alamos County Community Development and the case manager for the conditional use permit, described the proposal as a cottage development on about 9.51 acres with townhome‑style buildings, shared access drives, pedestrian connections and on‑site amenities. "The proposed development is fully supported by adopted county plans and policies," Valdez told the commission, and she noted staff found the application met the conditional use decision criteria under the county development code. Valdez also said the county's affordable housing plan estimates an immediate need for 1,689 housing units and that the county hopes to bring roughly 2,400 units online between 2024 and 2029.
The applicant, represented by Josh Rogers of Titan Development, described the site plan as 36 two‑story buildings containing a total of 114 townhome units (two‑ and three‑unit buildings), all with three bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms and two‑car garages. The proposal includes a roughly 2,200‑square‑foot community building with a leasing office and fitness area, multiple community gardens, a tot lot that the applicant said will be open to surrounding neighborhoods, and trail connections to San Ildefonso and nearby open space.
Rogers said the development was designed to be lower density than typical multifamily. "We wanted to do this very appropriate cottage development with townhomes that had... much lower density than multifamily," he said, adding the project is approximately 12–13 units per acre compared with about 24–25 units per acre for a garden‑style apartment project.
Valdez and applicant representatives addressed several concerns raised during public comment and by commissioners. Staff said the interdepartmental review committee (IDRC) reviewed utilities, grading and drainage, fire access and traffic; the county's Department of Public Utilities and Fire Marshal had reviewed plans and found capacity or mitigation measures acceptable. The applicant said a six‑foot concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall is proposed along the eastern property edge adjacent to Broadview Estates and that drainage basins and waterproofing will be included in the grading plans. The civil engineer noted the eastern drainage basin is small and that county requirements are to keep developed drainage on site.
Residents raised questions about school capacity and classroom size; a Broadview Estates resident said Barranca Mesa Elementary currently has classes with about 24 students and expressed concern that the housing increase would add dozens of students. Commissioners and staff replied that school planning is managed by the school district and that the county's review focuses on land‑use, utilities and public safety. One resident and another speaker urged ongoing communication across county departments and with the school district as growth occurs.
The applicant gave a rent estimate during questioning, saying a reasonable range today would be roughly $3,400 to $3,800 per month, with a mid‑$3,000s target. The developer also pledged ongoing outreach to neighbors during grading and construction and said the tot lot would be accessible to nearby residents via an easement if the neighbors choose to open a pedestrian connection.
Staff recommended approval, concluding the proposal meets the conditional use criteria: conformity with adopted plans, no material detriment to public safety or welfare when standard conditions are applied, conformance with code and adequate utilities and access. The commission authorized the chair to sign a final order documenting the decision; the written decision may be appealed within 15 calendar days under county rules.
