Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Abatement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission delays vote on 20-year tax abatement for Sogo Properties after commissioners ask for more analysis
Summary
Montgomery County commissioners discussed a proposed amendment to extend a state 9-C brownfield tax abatement for Sogo Properties (formerly Whitfield Foods) from 10 to 20 years and agreed to carry the item to a future meeting while staff and the Chamber provide additional tax and cost-benefit details.
Get email alerts on the Tax Abatement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montgomery County commissioners discussed a resolution to amend a previously approved Alabama abatement agreement for Sogo Properties LLC — extending a brownfield tax abatement from 10 years to 20 years — and agreed to move the item to a future agenda for more information.
The commission opened the item as a resolution to approve an amendment increasing the abatement length for Sogo, the company that recently purchased Whitfield Foods’ operations in the county. Joe Friday, president of Sogo Packaging, described the proposal as a 9-C brownfield remediation abatement under state law and said the company had completed environmental work on about 27 acres, including two environmental assessments, core drilling and sampling, and removal of three underground storage tanks. “We removed 3 underground storage tanks. Cost of that was around $300,000,” Friday said. He said the remediation work and resulting cleanup reduce future environmental risk on the property adjacent to the rail yard.
Commissioners pressed for additional financial detail before final action. One commissioner said he had discussed the resolution language with the county administrator and asked whether a cost-benefit or tax analysis had been provided. County staff and commissioners noted that the Industrial Development Board had previously approved related applications but that 9-C abatement approval required separate city and county action and notification from the Alabama Department of Revenue. Commissioner comments referenced the Alabama Department of Environmental Management’s (ADEM) involvement in the remediation work and the state statute framework that authorizes 9-B (equipment) and 9-C (brownfield) abatements.
County staff said the Chamber of Commerce typically prepares a discretionary incentive economic-impact matrix, but because this is a statutory incentive the Chamber had not produced a standard cost-benefit matrix. The commission asked staff to obtain and circulate the chamber’s tax analysis and any additional documentation. Sharon Rhodes (staff) was identified as having researched the tax and abatement details and said she would share the materials with the commission ahead of the next meeting. The company noted it currently employs about 115 people at the Montgomery facility.
Because commissioners wanted the additional financial and tax-abatement detail, the chair directed staff to place the resolution on the next meeting agenda rather than taking immediate action. No vote on final adoption occurred at this meeting.
The item had previously been approved in a different form, the commission said, and the proposed amendment would change the abatement’s duration. Commissioners discussed the county’s consistent treatment of long-standing businesses and noted Whitfield Foods’ long history in the county as context for consideration.
Next steps: staff will circulate the chamber’s tax analysis and the county’s research; the commission will revisit the resolution at a subsequent meeting.

