Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Finance Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff outlines routine bid awards, IT renewals, senior-service contract renewals and a KDADS grant to aging services
Summary
During agenda review staff summarized four bid-board items (including a bridge improvement and IT hardware renewal), a KDADS grant to the aging department for $119,534, Senior Care Act contract renewals and two new vendor contracts, and a proposal to streamline routine grant approvals for the remainder of 2025.
Sedgwick County staff briefed commissioners on procurement and grant items slated for the Aug. 13 agenda, including routine bid approvals, IT renewals, senior-services contracts and a KDADS grant to the aging department.
County staff said the bid board includes four items: a change order to extend an EMR (electronic medical records) implementation end date for CDDO provider network work; a bridge-improvement project over the North Fork of the Ninnescah River; an electronic-monitoring contract for the Department of Corrections; and a hardware renewal (network SSA agreement) for county IT.
The aging department will receive a KDADS grant award of $119,534 to support caregivers of people with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, staff said. In addition, staff listed renewal of three Senior Care Act vendor contracts (GraceMed, Medscope and Miracle Home Care) and two new vendor contracts (Interim Health Care and LifeStation) to deliver services that help older Kansans with functional limitations remain in community-based residences.
Staff also described a proposal to create a standing list of routine, repetitive grants for the remainder of 2025. The list would allow the county manager to authorize applications and acceptances and to establish budget authority within the scope of expected awards, with the goal of streamlining repetitive grants and reducing delays for departments.
County staff cautioned that the routine-grants list would not allocate new resources automatically; projects requiring capital or budget changes would still come to the commission for review. The procurement and grant items were presented at agenda review and are scheduled for formal action at the Aug. 13 meeting; no final votes were recorded in the transcript excerpt provided.
