Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Investigations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Iowa Board of Regents orders investigations into alleged social-media policy violations, delegates authority to presidents and executive director
Summary
The Iowa Board of Regents voted unanimously to direct the three public universities to investigate alleged violations of board social-media policy, place employees under administrative leave as warranted, and delegate future investigatory authority to the executive director.
Get email alerts on the Board Investigations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Iowa Board of Regents voted Wednesday to direct the presidents of the University of Iowa, Iowa State University and the University of Northern Iowa to immediately investigate alleged violations of board policy related to social media and, where warranted, place employees on administrative leave.
The measure, adopted by roll call, also authorized university presidents to take “immediate action up to and including termination” based on investigation findings and delegated to the board’s executive director the authority to order investigations of future alleged violations, including temporary administrative leave.
Regent Ryswick moved the measure and Regent Gipple seconded it. The motion passed on a roll-call vote with all present regents recorded as voting yes.
Why it matters: Regents said the step was necessary to protect students and employees while legal and personnel issues are addressed. Several regents said they were acting to respond quickly to social-media posts the board described as potentially disruptive to campus operations.
Board discussion and context Regent Hensley said earlier internal investigation delays had “prevented us from moving forward” and supported a prompt, structured review. Regent Barker said she had been “very close to voting no” because she believed some cases might not require extended investigation, but that she did not want the vote to be seen as opposing action. Regent Kramer acknowledged free-speech protections while stressing a need to determine whether online material “cross[es] the threshold” for employee discipline.
The motion’s text directed the universities to complete investigations within two weeks where feasible, to place employees “subject to investigation on administrative leave or have them removed from the classroom,” and to authorize presidents to take immediate employment action after each completed investigation. The motion further delegated to the executive director the authority to order future investigations and temporary administrative-leave placements.
Regents followed with a roll-call vote. Regent Dunkel, Regent Barker, Regent Hensley, Regent Rouse, Regent Ryswick, Regent Gipple, Regent Jaden, Regent Kramer and Regent Bates were recorded voting yes; the motion was approved.
What the vote does not do The board did not specify particular cases in the public motion text and did not announce personnel decisions at the meeting. The motion delegates investigatory authority to university leadership and the board office but does not itself impose discipline for any named employee.
What's next Board members said they expect university presidents and the executive director to report back as investigations progress. The board did not set a public follow-up date during the meeting.

