Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Township Employment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brimfield trustees dissolve township business manager position
Summary
The Brimfield Board of Trustees voted unanimously to dissolve the township business manager position during an executive-session follow-up at its Aug. 20 meeting.
Get email alerts on the Township Employment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Brimfield Board of Trustees voted unanimously Aug. 20 to dissolve the township business manager position effective immediately.
Trustee Nick Cloya, who made the motion after the board returned from executive session, said the decision followed the board's internal discussions about the township's direction. Trustee Mike Kostenski seconded the motion, and a roll-call vote recorded yes votes from Mike Kostenski, Trustee Sue Fields and Cloya.
The resolution to dissolve the position was introduced immediately after the board concluded its executive session. Cloya said the board believed "we need to move in a new direction at this point," language he used during the public meeting when making the motion. After a second and brief discussion, the trustees voted 3-0 to approve the dissolution.
The board did not name a successor or provide details about severance, transition plans or who will assume the business manager's duties. During the meeting the board directed further administrative follow-up but did not place any employment details into the public record at the time of the vote.
The trustees had convened the executive session earlier under Ohio Revised Code Section 121.22(G) for matters related to employment and conferences with legal counsel. The meeting returned to open session before the public motion dissolving the position.
The board's action does not include immediate information about temporary assignments or how payroll, billing or vendor relationships previously handled by the business manager will be managed; trustees said follow-up items will be addressed in future meetings. The board recorded no further votes on employment terms during the open meeting.
Records from the meeting show the board followed the roll-call process in public session and recorded the action as approved. Additional administrative steps the trustees referenced, including reassignment of duties and any formal personnel notices, were not specified during the Aug. 20 meeting.

