Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 1401 N Lakeline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs rezoning at 1401 N. Lakeline to allow retail and restaurants with caveats
Summary
The commission unanimously recommended rezoning a nearly 3-acre site at 1401 North Lakeline from professional office to local business to permit retail uses; commissioners probed building-permit timing, proximity to Mason Elementary, and alcohol/spacing rules.
The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7‑0 to recommend rezoning a nearly 3‑acre property at 1401 North Lakeline from professional office to the local business district (agenda item C‑3). The change would allow retail uses on a site staff described as suitable for local office/retail commercial under the comprehensive plan.
Staff presenter (identified on the record as Schwinger) said the property is currently zoned professional office and noted adjacent uses include Mason Elementary to the north, a daycare to the south, and single‑family residences to the east and west. “The comprehensive plan identifies this property is suitable for local office retail commercial,” the staff presentation stated.
Several commissioners asked about building permits that had been submitted before zoning was approved. The transcript records a building‑permit record “in queue” with a May 7 entry for a 2,294‑square‑foot shell building described as a restaurant. Assistant Director Veda David told the commission that a restaurant is permitted in the professional office district under special conditions and that the proposed retail uses are the trigger for the requested rezoning. “A restaurant is actually permitted in the Provisional Office zoning district. So in that case, it's no issue with the zoning,” David said.
Commissioners questioned how proximity rules for alcoholic‑beverage establishments would apply. City staff explained that the 300‑foot/1,000‑foot separation rules referenced in the code apply to alcoholic‑beverage establishments (bars/package liquor) and that a restaurant with alcohol sales can qualify under a definition that considers a percentage of sales. Assistant City Attorney Joe Hoffman added that “regardless if y'all were to approve the zoning tonight, and alcoholic beverage sales was allowed in that, but one of them was proposed within the prohibited spacing requirements, it would not be allowed.”
Anthony Good, the applicant’s engineer, described the site plan and said the smallest building near the courtyard is the proposed restaurant; he added that the developer has received inquiries from prospective tenants but has not finalized leases. Good confirmed the developer intends a mix of professional office and retail uses.
The commission had two registered supporters and no registered opponents on the public record. Commissioner Antel moved to recommend approval; Commissioner Wernicke seconded. The motion carried 7‑0 and will be forwarded to City Council for public hearing and final action.
