Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fountain Green planning commission weighs changes to subdivision utility rules, approves several permits
Summary
At its Aug. 14 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, commissioners discussed revising subdivision language that currently requires physical utility hookups before approval and approved a set of applications including accessory building electrical, signs, Connex containers, a house permit and multiple sheds.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fountain Green Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 14 debated rewriting local subdivision language that currently requires applicants to provide physical utility hookups before a simple lot subdivision can be approved, and approved a set of routine permits and applications.
The commission discussed proposed edits to Title 10 (subdivision provisions) and Title 11 (land use) to replace the requirement that applicants "provide utility hookups" with language requiring proposed utility plans as part of subdivision applications. City staff and commission members said the change is intended to allow lot splits where utilities are available or shown on plans without requiring builders to dig in meters or stub-outs before approval.
"We're trying to come up with a way of saying utilities have to be available to the lot. They don't have to be meter[ed]—they don't have to be put on the lot," a commission member said during the discussion. City staff described options such as requiring proposed main lines and service locations on the submitted plans and letting final stub-outs or meter installations occur later, prior to building permits.
Commissioners also reviewed how the city's simple-lot subdivision process compares with neighboring Moroni's and noted recent state changes that affect public-notice and review requirements. Several members said they are reluctant to adopt a narrowed, two-lot exception without legal review. The commission asked staff to request formal guidance from the city attorney/consultant (referred to in the meeting as Shay) on whether a simplified two-lot pathway would meet state requirements.
In a separate policy discussion, commissioners clarified how staff should respond to public inquiries about ordinances. The commission agreed staff should direct callers to the city website and the written ordinances for routine questions and recommend that residents attend a meeting when answers are not clear from the posted materials. City staff said an updated citizen's guide and a written checklist for short-term rental approvals are in progress.
On permits and applications, the commission approved multiple items on the consent/regular agenda: a request to add electrical service to an existing outdoor building; a flat wall sign (5-by-8 feet, low-intensity lighting) for a commercial building; placement of a Connex (shipping container) with required anchoring; building plans for Block 18 (Jarendson Properties); a house permit for Richard Anderson; and prebuilt sheds (including a 10-by-20 shed) for applicants including Kyle Thompson and others. Approvals were made by motion and voice vote without roll-call tallies recorded in the meeting transcript.
Commissioners spent time clarifying administrative details that applicants must follow: setback verification forms (one-sheet city form), a $10 setback verification fee referenced in the city's guidance for small structures, and the city guidance that structures under 200 square feet without utilities generally do not require city building permits but do require setback verification and an appointment for verification. The commission recommended updating the auxiliary-building application so it includes a utilities checkbox rather than separate paper forms for utility vs. non-utility auxiliary buildings and asked staff to explore converting forms to editable PDFs for the city website.
The commission did not take any final ordinance votes at the meeting; members directed staff to prepare drafted wording changes and consult the city attorney/consultant before returning the revised text for a future public hearing. Several commissioners said they prefer to postpone any public hearing until October to ensure legal review and to incorporate recommended edits.
Votes at a glance: the commission approved all presented permit applications by motion and voice vote during the meeting (no recorded roll-call tallies in the transcript). Items approved included: electricity to an existing outdoor building; a 5-by-8 low-intensity flat/wall sign; placement of a Connex container; building plans for Jarendson Properties (Block 18); a house permit for Richard Anderson; and prebuilt sheds including a 10-by-20 shed for Kyle Thompson.
The commission set follow-up tasks for staff: ask the city attorney/consultant whether a simplified two-lot approval path would meet state requirements; draft and circulate proposed ordinance language to replace "provide utility hookups" with a requirement for proposed utility plans/main lines on subdivision applications; develop a short-term rental application checklist and a combined auxiliary-building application with a utilities checkbox; and prepare PDF/electronic versions of forms for the city website.
The meeting closed after minutes and administrative items were addressed.
