Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Financial Services Cash Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County hears presentation from CashVest (3plus1/NACo) on non-tax revenue opportunities

5594214 · August 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representatives of CashVest (partnered with the National Association of Counties) presented a data-driven service intended to identify underperforming cash and generate non-tax revenues; the board agreed to accept the presentation administratively and continue due diligence.

Representatives of CashVest, a cash- and treasury-data service partnered with the National Association of Counties, gave a remote presentation to the Oktibbeha County Board of Supervisors on using data to generate additional non-tax revenue and improve returns on county cash balances.

Ed Butler, account manager, and Kevin Ford described CashVest’s approach: they analyze bank-account and transaction data, benchmark cash returns against market benchmarks (the presenters cited 30-day U.S. Treasury yields and current market figures), and propose options within a county’s investment policy. Butler said the service is free on a trial basis if no benefit is shown and that CashVest does not act as an investor or custodian; it provides data and connects the county to market opportunities.

Supervisors asked about scale and fees. Presenters said their fee is a flat, budget-based fee and that they perform periodic “stress tests” and cash-flow forecasting. One supervisor remarked that Oktibbeha County is seeking nontraditional revenue sources and that the program could be beneficial.

A motion was made to accept the presentation administratively and to authorize staff to continue due diligence with the presenters; the board recorded the vote as 4–1 in favor.

No contract was approved at the meeting; staff were asked to do further review and return with recommendations if the county pursues the service.