Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission tables zone change for proposed tiny‑house site at 447 S. Third after quorum questions
Summary
A planning commission recommendation to allow up to 15 tiny homes at 447 South Third Street was tabled after commissioners raised concerns about whether the planning commission vote met quorum requirements.
The Danville City Commission on July 28 voted to table consideration of a planning commission recommendation to approve a zoning map amendment that would allow GMX LLC to place up to 15 tiny houses on property at 447 South Third Street.
Planning staff (identified in the meeting as Miss Grama) told the commission that the planning commission had recommended a zoning map amendment with a condition restricting use to the proposed 15 tiny houses and continued services from the existing building on the lot. The recommendation was justified by a housing goal cited in the staff report.
Commission discussion focused on several procedural points. A commissioner asked how many planning commissioners participated in the recommendation; staff said six were present but two abstained because of involvement with a homeless coalition. Commissioner David Peake (identified in discussion) raised a legal concern about whether the planning commission’s action met the ordinance’s requirement for a majority of the full body rather than a majority of those present when two members abstained. Peake said the question “probably need[s] more than just a moment to react to” and recommended resolving the quorum question with staff before the commission votes.
Because of the uncertainty about the planning commission’s quorum and the validity of the recommendation, the commission withdrew the motion on the floor and voted to table the item to a future meeting so staff can confirm whether the planning commission’s vote complied with applicable procedural rules and to allow any necessary “cleanup.”
Planning staff said site-plan details — lot sizes and road- widening questions — would be addressed at the next stage if the project proceeds. The project proponents and several local groups including the Family Services Building, United Human Services and United Way were identified during the discussion as collaborators on services related to the project; a representative of the homeless coalition addressed the commission to explain that the proposal is for a single lot hosting individual short-term units and that applicants will be screened and subject to time-limited stays.
No final zoning action was taken; the item was tabled to the next regular meeting pending staff review of planning commission procedure.
