Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reform Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board begins overhaul of policy 3000 to set district goals; early childhood, culturally responsive instruction and school autonomy discussed
Summary
Superintendent Maggie and board members launched work on reform policy 3000 (educational goals and objectives). The discussion covered aligning the policy with the district strategic plan, emphasizing culturally responsive instruction, including early childhood priorities and clarifying district versus school-level planning and accountability.
The Asheville City Schools Board of Education began detailed discussion of reform policy 3,000, which sets the goals and objectives of the district'wide educational program. Superintendent Maggie said reform policies "drive transformational change" and should rest on the district's core beliefs, theory of action and strategic plan.
"What we do from 08:30 to 03:30, 07:30 to 02:30 every day with 3,800 students that walk through our doors," Maggie said when urging the board to define outcomes, classroom expectations and accountability.
Board members debated what to keep from the existing policy and what to change. Board member Pepe urged stronger language on early childhood services; Pepe argued a clear focus from birth through third grade is needed "so that by the time they reach fourth grade" students read on grade level. Another board member recommended connecting the policy to the district's Portrait of a Scholar and the strategic plan's stated promises and theory of action.
Several board members pressed for language to emphasize culturally responsive instruction and support structures for schools. One board member recommended the Chicago Public Schools example for its detailed commitments on culturally responsive education and anti'bias language, while others cautioned that a very long policy might be harder for administrators to use; one suggested placing detailed definitions and implementation guidance in an attached exhibit.
The board also discussed the balance between district direction and school autonomy. Maggie and several board members said individualized school plans should align with the district work plan while giving principals authority to lead their buildings. "The district sets their district work plan, and then the schools take that district work plan and build their school plans based off of that," one speaker said. Another board member recommended language that frames school plans as developed "in parallel or in collaboration with the district work plan."
Members agreed on the importance of specifying outcomes — for example, a goal that "every student is reading on grade level by the time they enter fourth grade" was suggested as a possible district outcome — and on including accountability and early identification for students needing extra support.
Superintendent Maggie outlined a next steps plan: draft policy language with feedback from advisory councils and family surveys, review with legal counsel, and return drafts to the board for first and second reads. "I'll start taking this policy to get feedback and start putting some drafts together and ideating with our educator advisory council, the student advisory council, working on a survey to get out to families," she said.
Board members asked for caution about promising program expansions (for example universal pre-K) without funding, and several said aspirational language should be balanced with fiscal reality.
The board agreed to continue work, with staff to return suggested drafts and to coordinate community and advisory input.
