Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Fulton County commissioners approve plan to build special‑purpose facility and renovate Rice Street jail

5608985 · August 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After months of study and public pressure over jail conditions, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners voted to move forward with a plan that builds a new special‑purpose facility for vulnerable inmates and later renovates the Rice Street Jail. The board approved the plan despite continued questions about costs, outsourcing and timing.

Fulton County commissioners on Wednesday voted to proceed with a capital improvement plan that calls for construction of a new special‑purpose facility to house medically and mentally vulnerable inmates and a later, multi‑year renovation of the Rice Street Main Jail.

County project managers and consultants told the board the option they recommended — labeled Option 3 in the staff presentation — aims to pull the most pressing behavioral‑care capacity out of the aging Rice Street complex first and, once the special‑purpose building is online, start phased renovations of Rice Street.

Megan Kaczkowski of ACR Partners, the county’s program management team, said the team chose the sequence "because the estimated cost to address the deficiencies, just for the Rice Street Main Jail alone, greatly exceeds the maximum allowable budget" the county gave staff last year. She told the commission that the study set a consistent comparative bed figure of 3,200 beds to model the options but that the final design and bed count will be refined during programming.

Consultant Roger Lichtman described the cost tradeoffs the team weighed: building a larger special‑purpose facility first increases early capital needs but, he said, reduces long‑term outsourcing costs the county would otherwise pay while work proceeds. "The outsourcing can't be financed," Lichtman told the board, arguing that funds the county currently spends to house inmates in other counties are sunk operating costs that could be converted to capital spending on new beds.

County Chief Financial Officer Sharon Whitmore outlined financing assumptions the team used, saying the county had identified existing resources and potential future streams to help cover annual debt service. For the motioned option, she said, "we would need to increase the millage rate by 0.83, a little more than three‑quarters of a mill" if other offsets are not available; she also pointed to returned TAD (tax allocation district) increments and a projected reduction in a closed defined‑benefit pension contribution as future offsets.

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans