Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Rc C1 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mendon planners propose clearer residential-commercial (C1/RC) rules to limit public meeting vetoes
Summary
Commissioners reviewed draft language to ensure land-use decisions in a proposed residential-commercial zone are decided by code and established principles rather than by volume of public opposition, and asked staff to define permitted and prohibited uses before taking the change to city council.
Mendon Planning and Zoning commissioners reviewed draft language that would tighten how land-use decisions are applied in a proposed residential-commercial (RC/C1) zone and reduce the ability of public opposition alone to block uses that meet code.
The draft language states land-use decisions in the C1 zone should be applied according to established zoning rules and adopted planning principles, and "shall not be based upon the preferences of individual groups or the relative volume of public opposition or support, but upon the consistent and equitable application of law and policy for the long-term benefit of the community." Commissioners agreed that language reflects the intent of state changes that created a clearer land-use authority and reduces ad-hoc decisions influenced by public pressure.
Staff and commissioners said that, before forwarding the language to city council, they must define what uses would be allowed in the RC/C1 zone and identify specific geographic areas where RC would apply (staff suggested along the highway corridors where traffic patterns and parcel size make light commercial compatible). Commissioners emphasized that clearly enumerated permitted, conditional and prohibited uses are essential so that a use that complies with the adopted zone standards would not be subject to denial based on popularity.
The commission discussed examples of desired businesses that would be appropriate in an RC zone, such as small medical or professional offices, light retail and convenience services that serve nearby residential areas. Staff noted that if a use is explicitly permitted by the zoning code it does not require a public hearing; conditional or unspecified uses would still trigger public hearings and additional review.
Commissioners directed staff to: (1) define RC and C1 permitted and prohibited uses, (2) propose candidate parcels along the highway for RC designation, and (3) return with model definitions and map recommendations to present to council. No final zone change was adopted at the meeting; staff will gather sample definitions and examples from other towns for follow-up.
