Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Debt And Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Financial adviser recommends terminating 2021C swap, issuing fixed-rate bonds for Bethlehem Area SD

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

PFM presented two refinancing paths for the district's roughly $30 million 2021C variable-rate bonds and recommended terminating the interest-rate swap and refunding with a fixed-rate bond issue; the board will consider a resolution later this month and the authority meets Aug. 20.

Scott Shears, a consultant with PFM, told the Bethlehem Area School District board on Aug. 11 that the advisory team recommends terminating the interest-rate swap tied to the district's 2021C variable-rate bonds and refunding those bonds with a fixed-rate issue.

Shears said the swap termination and refund would convert about $30 million of the district's roughly $204 million total debt portfolio into traditional fixed-rate debt. He described two options: (1) issue a fixed-rate bond and terminate the swap, or (2) replace the existing variable-rate bonds with new variable-rate notes and keep the swap in place. "The present value cost . . . is about a $886,000 cost," Shears said, adding that the roughly $886,000 present-value cost translates to an increase in annual debt service of about $185,000 a year for roughly six years under current indicative pricing.

The firm also reported a swap-termination amount if done immediately of roughly $2.2 million but said the full financial comparison should be viewed as a package that includes the termination payment and the lower fixed rates available in the current market. Shears said bond-market proposals returned to the district showed Raymond James as the strongest underwriter for a fixed-rate option; Wells Fargo provided the most attractive variable-rate proposal among the variable-market respondents but did not beat the fixed-rate outcome on a present-value basis.

The recommendation matters because the 2021C bonds and their swap represent nearly 15% of the district's debt portfolio and because an action must be taken before a Nov. 1 deadline the advisors cited. Shears outlined a short timeline: the authority will consider a resolution on Aug. 20, the school board could consider a bond-related resolution on Aug. 25, pricing and rating steps would follow in September if the fixed-rate option is chosen, and closing would occur in October.

Board members asked about tradeoffs. Dr. Beck Pulley said she favors the predictability of fixed-rate debt given the district's swap history and other uncertainties. Dr. White asked about timing relative to national political and market uncertainty and how a fixed structure would affect annual budgeting; Shears and other district staff said a fixed-rate portfolio provides consistent annual debt service the district can budget around. One board member, identified in the record as Harry, summarized the tradeoff: "The basic cost would be over 7 years, about $1,000,000, which would add about a $185,000 a year to our annual debt service cost."

Shears and district staff said they will bring a resolution forward to the authority Aug. 20 and expect to present a formal bond resolution to the board on Aug. 25 if the board chooses the fixed-rate path.

Questions remain about final pricing and the exact structure, and advisors said they will keep the business office and board updated if market conditions change before pricing.