Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities And Purchasing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners amend courthouse concrete contract to include higher bonding cost after statute review
Summary
After counsel advised bonding requirements, the board amended a facility‑services resolution to include a $6,002 bonding cost and recalculated project totals to comply with statutory bonding rules; county staff recommended adding the bond cost to the project base price.
Get email alerts on the Facilities And Purchasing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Livingston County Board of Commissioners amended and approved a resolution July 28 to add bonding costs for the historic courthouse administration concrete work after legal review found statutory bonding requirements applied.
County facility services and the county attorney briefed commissioners: contractors and surety markets were reported to demand a 100% performance bond for the vendor selected for the courthouse concrete construction. The vendor’s required bond amount—$6,002 (as presented in the updated resolution language)—was not included in the earlier signed contract language, and county counsel said statute requires at least a 25% bond for projects of this type. Facility services recommended adding the bond cost to the construction base price rather than drawing further on the project contingency (which had already been reduced).
Commissioners moved to amend the resolution to include the revised construction total and to add the $6,002 bonding amount into the project base. The amendment passed and the final resolution passed by roll call.
What’s next: facility services will finalize the contract amendment and fund accounting to reflect the added bond cost and adjusted project totals; staff said they will provide updated project accounting and record documents to the clerk’s office.

