Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Rezoning Fenton topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays Fenton Street special-use permit after neighborhood opposition and requests for more outreach
Summary
After extensive public comment from nearby homeowners and renters, Richmond City Council voted to continue consideration of a special-use permit for a proposed three-house infill at 2201–2203 Fenton Avenue to the Sept. 8 meeting to allow more community engagement.
Richmond City Council on July 28 voted to continue a proposed special-use permit (SUP) for development at 2201–2203 Fenton Avenue after residents raised notice, density and tree-loss concerns.
Residents said they received little or no direct notice about the application, expressed worry that the developer seeks to place three houses on a narrow lot (speakers cited existing lot rules and said typical lots are about 50 feet), and asked for more time for community meetings and information. Several speakers said the proposed subdivision would reduce tree canopy and exacerbate drainage and parking problems.
Developer presentation and staff review: A representative for Baker Development Resources said the SUP had been submitted in December, that the project had unanimous Planning Commission recommendation for approval, and that two homes could be built by right while the SUP seeks permission for an additional third home. He said the SUP includes design and public-improvement commitments such as new sidewalks, three street trees and two off-street parking spaces per home.
Council action: After a public hearing that included multiple speakers in opposition and 1 speaker for the developer, Councilmember Abubakar moved to continue the item to the Sept. 8 council meeting to allow a developer-led community meeting and additional discussion; the motion passed by recorded voice vote with all members present voting in favor.
Clarifying details: Speakers cited a typical lot width of 50 feet and said the developer was proposing lot splits to 26 feet and one as small as 11 feet. The developer said two units were allowed by right and the SUP request was for the third unit; the SUP review included recommended public improvements and materials standards.
Ending: Council continued the application to Sept. 8 and asked the developer to hold a community meeting and return with additional outreach and responses to resident concerns.
