Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Leaf Blower Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Bluff committee urges board to expedite longer ban on gas leaf blowers; study on electric feasibility remains pending
Summary
Committee members pressed the Village Board to move from the current May 15–Sept. 30 restriction toward a nine-month ban and, ultimately, year-round restrictions, while a commissioned regional study on year-round electric leaf blower feasibility continues.
Members of the Village of Lake Bluff Sustainability & Community Enhancement Committee pressed the village board Oct. 21 to accelerate a longer restriction on gas-powered leaf blowers, arguing the village should move from its current May 15–Sept. 30 restriction to a nine-month ban and plan to extend to a year-round prohibition as soon as reasonably possible.
Committee members said several North Shore communities have already adopted nine-month bans and asked the village board to enact the same step now rather than wait for the results of a regional study that is assessing the feasibility of non-gas (battery/electric) equipment for year-round leaf management. A staff presentation described the study as a Greater Chicago–area analysis of whether non-gas equipment can handle leaf fall year round; the village board has paused further restriction until the study is completed.
The committee discussed trade-offs raised by the study: past evaluations noted non-gas equipment may be less efficient during peak leaf season, which could increase contractor time and homeowner cost. Several committee members said the costs to residents and landscapers are manageable and urged the village to push for a nine-month restriction now and to plan for a 12‑month restriction in the near future. The committee agreed to place a recommendation on the next SEC agenda asking the village board to expedite a nine-month ban with an implementation plan to move to 12 months when reasonably possible.
No formal vote was recorded at the Oct. 21 meeting; the committee discussed filing a formal motion at a subsequent meeting. Staff noted the study's proposal and timeline are available on the village website and that the village board has kept the existing May 15–Sept. 30 timeframe in place while the multi-community study proceeds.
Committee members also discussed licensing landscapers as part of a longer-term enforcement and education strategy, which could incorporate new leaf-blower rules and tree-care guidelines into a licensing framework. That idea would require additional research, ordinance changes, and likely village board action.
