HCISD outlines timeline and stakeholder process for district and campus improvement plans
Loading...
Summary
District leaders reviewed the annual cycle for district and campus improvement plans, explained alignment with the HCISD strategic plan, and said campus plans will be provided to trustees for review before a board approval vote.
District and campus leaders presented the district’s annual improvement‑plan process and timeline to the Transforming Teaching and Learning Committee, emphasizing data‑driven goal setting, stakeholder engagement and alignment to the HCISD strategic plan.
Tanya Garza (presenting) said district and campus improvement plans are developed from comprehensive needs assessments that use end‑of‑year performance data, attendance, discipline trends and program evaluations. The process begins in late winter and continues through summer for data analysis and needs identification; campuses then draft goals and strategies in the fall with stakeholder input from teachers, parents and community members.
Garza described an annual review cycle: campuses and the district conduct three formative reviews between November and March, and then a summative review follows to summarize outcomes and next steps. She said plans are posted on the district website for transparency and are aligned to the HCISD strategic plan to ensure consistency across campuses. "These plans are not just compliance documents. They serve as a framework that really does guide our district and our campus," she said.
Next steps outlined to the committee included distributing campus plans to trustees later in the week, providing a one‑page "at‑a‑glance" guide for board review, and requesting board approval of the district and campus performance objectives at the upcoming board meeting. Committee members asked how campus engagement varies by campus size and culture; presenters said principals use workshops and committee sessions and tailor the process to each campus while maintaining consistent expectations and measurable goals.
No formal action was taken; staff said they will provide the campus improvement plans and the one‑page summaries to trustees for review before the approval vote.

