Residents, advocates press council to decline renewal of Flock surveillance contract; council to vote in November
Loading...
Summary
At public comment multiple residents and immigrant‑rights and privacy advocates urged council not to renew the city's contract with Flock license‑plate readers and related products, citing risks of data sharing with federal agencies and a lack of transparency about data retention and access.
Multiple speakers at the council meeting urged Charlottesville to decline renewal of its contract with Flock, a private vendor for license‑plate readers and video analytics. Speakers cited national examples in which license‑plate data has been used by immigration or law enforcement authorities, or sold between vendors and agencies, and urged the city not to continue the contract when it comes up for renewal in November.
Isis Newman said police told a meeting that Charlottesville holds Flock data for seven days but the company’s retention policies were unknown and could change. Several speakers connected surveillance concerns to broader worries about data sharing, immigration enforcement and reproductive privacy. Other commenters cited a recent Colorado case and examples of cross‑jurisdictional data use.
City staff and police have said previously that local access to data is limited and that the system has had limited operational hits, but critics said promises of limited sharing do not guarantee protection from future access requests or corporate sales. The speakers urged transparent oversight and, where possible, elimination of surveillance tools that could be used against vulnerable residents.
Council did not take a final vote at the meeting; staff said the contract renewal will come before council in November for a decision.
