Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Athletics committee urges director-level role and larger budget, proposes raising athletics spending to 1% of district budget

October 24, 2025 | Hamilton County, School Districts, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Athletics committee urges director-level role and larger budget, proposes raising athletics spending to 1% of district budget
Steve Shady, school representative and Athletics Committee member, presented the committee’s vision and mission and a set of recommendations on athletics funding and structure. The committee recommended three primary changes: elevate the athletics-coordinator title to director of athletics, adopt the committee’s vision and mission statements as guiding policy, and increase the athletics budget to a minimum of 1% of the total district budget.

Shady told trustees the athletics budget currently runs about 0.67% of the district’s budget and that raising it to 1% would increase the athletics allocation by roughly $2,000,000 (from about $4.2 million to close to $6.2 million). He said the added funding would be dedicated primarily to coach compensation and to smaller facility and transportation needs that vary by school.

Rationale and priorities: The committee’s written mission emphasizes equitable opportunity to participate in high-quality interscholastic athletics, investments in facilities, recruitment and compensation for coaches, and appropriate staffing and training to ensure safety and competitiveness. Shady argued elevating Tim James’s position to a director-level role would formalize his responsibilities and be a modest compensation increase; he described the change as “probably less than $10,000 a year” in additional cost.

Board exchange: Trustees asked clarifying questions about what the athletics budget covers (coach supplements, limited transportation support, catastrophic insurance, and a trainer program provided through an agreement with Erlanger). Board members also raised concerns about equitable priorities across district needs, whether athletics increases would compete with central-office or classroom priorities, and whether coaches’ seasonal stipends might create situations where supplements approach administrative pay levels. Staff explained stipend caps (currently a 30% overall cap on coaching supplements) and said the stipend structure and any proposed increases could be modeled within the broader compensation and budget discussions.

Ending: Steve Shady said the athletics committee will continue refining the proposal (including potential flat-rate versus percentage stipend models and whether to add an assistant to the athletics coordinator) and staff agreed to provide additional data, including participation and comparative budget figures, at a future meeting. No board action was taken at the work session.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Tennessee articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI