Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Court of Appeals hears dispute over prenup valuation, expert disclosures in Moyle v. Moyle
Summary
The Utah Court of Appeals heard argument in Moyle v. Moyle (No. 20231097), a family‑law appeal raising whether a prenuptial agreement and trial court findings correctly set the date and method for valuing net worth, and whether the court abused its discretion on attorney fees, expert disclosures, bifurcation, and property classification.
The Utah Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Moyle v. Moyle (No. 20231097), a family‑law appeal in which the parties dispute how a premarital agreement and trialcourt findings should determine when and how to value each spouse’s net worth and which trial rulings to uphold.
Appellant Jamie Moyle, through counsel Brody Miles, argued the district court erred by allowing a financial expert to testify without producing underlying documents and by applying inconsistent valuation dates for net‑worth calculations. "None of those [underlying documents] were ever provided," Miles told the panel, saying the absence of the underlying data prevented effective cross‑examination and tainted valuation figures the court used. The parties and judges discussed a contested valuation of an interest in…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
