Waukesha Finance Committee adopts rewritten purchasing policy, raises goods-and-services threshold
Loading...
Summary
The Finance Committee unanimously recommended that the Common Council adopt a substantially rewritten purchasing and bidding policy (F 6.0) that updates roles, procurement methods and dollar thresholds for approvals, including raising the city's goods-and-services threshold to $75,000; the committee voted to forward the policy to council.
The Waukesha City Finance Committee on Aug. 12 unanimously voted to recommend adoption of a substantially rewritten purchasing and bidding policy (F 6.0) that updates roles and responsibilities, clarifies procurement methods and raises the city's approval threshold for goods and services to $75,000.
The rewritten policy replaces an older purchasing framework staff said had not been comprehensively updated since the mid-1990s. Tony, a staff member who presented the draft, told the committee "the last time it was reviewed and revised comprehensively was likely in the mid-90s." He described the rewrite as reorganizing the policy to add clear definitions, a roles-and-responsibilities section, and explicit procurement procedures for public construction, non-public-construction purchases, and professional services.
Committee members and city legal staff discussed the biggest operational changes: dollar thresholds that determine when the council must approve an item, and when staff or the mayor/city administrator may authorize purchases. "Regarding goods and services, we adjusted the $25,000 current threshold to $75,000," Tony said. Under the new draft, purchases greater than $75,000 would come before the Common Council for approval; purchases of $10,000 or more but under $75,000 could be approved at the mayor or city administrator level and executed administratively; purchases of $10,000 or less would be handled at the departmental level.
Brian, the city attorney, told the committee the policy also addresses a legal control the city lacked in earlier practice. "All contracts that are going to be binding on the city have to be authorized by the Common Council," he said, and added that the new policy provides blanket authorization for routine, budgeted purchase orders to be executed administratively when they meet the policy's criteria. He also noted how execution of contracts typically falls to the mayor: "Most of the time, it will fall to the mayor because the mayor typically executes contracts."
For public-construction purchases the policy defers to state statute thresholds. Tony told the committee there is pending state legislation that would raise the state's $25,000 threshold for certain public-construction competitive requirements to $50,000; if that bill passes the city would return to the Finance Committee and Common Council to adjust its policy language or adopt a cross-reference to the state code.
The draft spells out procurement procedures (RFI/RFQ/RFP), minimum solicitation steps and a recommended timetable, and separates public-construction procurement from other purchases. It also adds a new 6.4 "Roles and responsibilities" section that assigns tasks and approval authorities by position, and proposes a short procedural manual to accompany the policy so departments and staff have a single internal reference for processes such as sole-source use, state contract purchasing and purchasing-consortium agreements.
The committee discussed fleet purchases and budgeted capital projects. Tony said fleet purchases approved in the CIP and within the approved budget would continue to be handled administratively at staff level; only fleet projects that exceed the approved budget would return to the council for approval. He also described a recent reorganization that created a Fleet Division with a fleet manager, lead mechanic and parts/stock attendant; the policy will direct departments to involve the Fleet Division in equipment and vehicle specifications so the city can standardize equipment across departments.
Committee members asked about sole-source purchase handling and about emergency procurements. Staff said there is not a separate stand-alone sole-source policy outside this draft; the policy calls out purchasing consortiums and state contract use but makes clear those do not automatically constitute a sole-source justification. For emergency purchases, staff said the existing policy practice will be followed and report-back to council will occur when emergency spending is made; staff noted recent sewer and utility emergencies have required rapid procurement actions that may run in the tens of thousands of dollars.
After questions and the changes discussed at the meeting (including clarifying language about fleet purchases and tying public-construction thresholds to state statute language), the committee chair moved to recommend the Common Council adopt the revised Financial Policy F 6.0, "Purchasing and Bidding,"with a second by Alderman Alvin Slavin. The committee approved the motion by voice vote; the motion passed unanimously and will be forwarded to the Common Council for final action.
What happens next Staff said they will: (1) make the clarifying edits discussed at the meeting (notably the fleet purchase sentence and a cross-reference to the state statute amount), (2) prepare a short procedural manual describing the internal steps (including city-attorney review) and listing approved purchasing consortiums and (3) present the ordinance or resolution and final policy to the Common Council for adoption. A separate budget "show and tell" for capital items will be held Aug. 26 at the City Garage on Sentry Drive.
