Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Festival Table Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison Heights council adopts revised festival table policy after lengthy debate, 6-1
Summary
At its Aug. 11 meeting, the Madison Heights City Council voted 6-1 to approve a revised festival table policy that restores table space for local officeholders and local official candidates while narrowing requests from nonlocal officeholders and challengers.
Get email alerts on the Festival Table Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison Heights — The City Council voted 6-1 on Aug. 11 to approve a revised festival table policy that restores individual table space at the city's Festival in the Park for incumbents and official candidates for Madison Heights mayor and council seats while narrowing how the city will handle requests from county, state or federal officeholders and candidates.
The change, proposed during the council's regular meeting, drew more than an hour of debate about whether allowing candidates at a community festival would politicize the event. Supporters said tables give candidates and officeholders a structured way to engage residents and reduce litter and unmonitored distribution of campaign literature; opponents warned the event could become "inherently political." The motion passed on a roll-call vote, 6-1.
Under the approved language, the policy allows individual tables for nonprofit organizations, city boards and commissions, festival sponsors, city departments and for incumbents and official candidates for Madison Heights mayor and council positions, consistent with the draft presented to council. Council also narrowed the section that previously referenced "special dignitaries and or official candidates for offices that represent Madison Heights (such as governor, U.S. senators, U.S. congress members)," limiting those requests to currently elected officeholders who represent Madison Heights rather than extending the same access to their challengers outside the city. Councilman Mark Bliss, the motion's sponsor, said he would remove the broader "official candidates" language in that section and bring any expansion back for a future council consideration.
"Giving them the table helps to segregate it," Councilman Mark Bliss said, arguing that providing a table keeps distribution of literature contained and easier to monitor. Councilor Emily Rohrbach emphasized the policy's intent. "This policy is not about people running for office or not. It's about engagement with the residents and the opportunity to engage," she said. Councilor Wright, who cast the lone vote against the measure, warned that widening access could make the festival more political: "I don't want us to ruin that by throwing this policy in here on the whim of folks that frankly aren't going to be here when it's time."
City Manager Marsh replied to questions about implementation and said staff included the extra language to give direction should out-of-city officeholders request a table, citing an incident at a prior festival in which a candidate circulated literature that created litter in the park. Marsh described the revised wording as intended to give staff discretion "to accommodate if feasible" and to prevent unmonitored activity in the park.
Council members discussed several compromise options during the meeting, including limiting tables to those who represent Madison Heights at county, state or federal levels, or striking the broader language entirely. Ultimately the adopted motion keeps local incumbents and local official candidates eligible for tables and restricts requests from other levels to current officeholders who represent Madison Heights; the council agreed to revisit whether to allow challengers for nonlocal offices at a future meeting.
The clerk recorded votes as follows: Mayor Grafton, yes; Mayor Pro Tem Bliss, yes; Councilman Fleming, yes; Councilman Muir, yes; Councilor Rohrbach, yes; Councilman Soltis, yes; Councilor Wright, no. The motion passed 6-1. City staff will implement the updated policy for festival logistics and report back if further clarification is needed.
The meeting also included routine consent items and communications; no public commenters spoke on the policy during the public comment period preceding the discussion.

