Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Gis Mapping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Houston County to consider contract for enhanced GIS mapping support
Summary
Commissioners heard a staff presentation on a proposed contract with a consulting firm to provide full-time GIS support, integrate the county parcel viewer with Ingenuity software and update aerial imagery; the item was placed on the commission agenda for Tuesday with no objection.
Get email alerts on the Gis Mapping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Houston County Commission heard a staff presentation on a proposed contract to provide enhanced geographic information system (GIS) support and maintenance and agreed to place the item on the commission agenda for Tuesday.
County staff said the contract would bring an outside consulting firm in to manage the county's GIS servers, provide routine support for the parcel viewer and integrate the parcel viewer with the county's Ingenuity software so parcel pages link directly to Ingenuity records. A county GIS staff member said parcel data are stored in-house but updates to the publicly visible parcel viewer had lagged and the prior contractor was effectively a one-person operation that had taken other employment, leaving the county with intermittent support.
Staff said the contracted support would increase the frequency of updates to the public parcel viewer (staff have not yet decided whether those updates would be daily or weekly) and would allow new aerial photography to be uploaded when it is available. The presenter said the last county aerial photography was from 02/2022 and the county plans to budget for new imagery in the 2026โ27 budget cycle.
Commissioners asked whether taxpayers would see a change in what is available online; staff said parcel owner records would be updated on a sooner cadence than under the current arrangement. No formal vote was recorded at the meeting; the chairman asked whether there was any objection to placing the item on Tuesday's agenda and none was raised.
The proposal as discussed would authorize the chairman to negotiate and execute the contract following placement on the agenda and any subsequent action at Tuesday's meeting.
Details left unspecified at the meeting included the final contractor name spelling (the agenda listed HEAT Consulting Services while the presenter also referred to the firm as KCS/Keats) and the precise update cadence (daily vs. weekly).

