Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Street Renaming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bakersfield council directs staff to seek H Street renaming to Cesar Chavez Boulevard; planning process and costs to follow
Summary
Council directed city staff to prepare a planning‑commission application to rename H Street to Avenida de Cesar Chavez. Staff outlined potential costs, affected addresses and notification processes; the planning commission will review the proposal and notice affected addresses.
The Bakersfield City Council on Aug. 13 directed staff to prepare an application to the Planning Commission to consider renaming H Street to Avenida de Cesar Chavez and to return with a final fiscal analysis and community‑engagement plan.
Staff presentation and considerations: City staff described the city’s street‑renaming policy (resolution updated in 2021), the standard public‑notice and Planning Commission process, and preliminary counts for H Street. Staff estimated about 390 addresses along the full H Street corridor from Taft Highway to Golden State Highway, of which roughly 243 are commercial and 147 residential; about 202 of the addresses hold current city business licenses. Staff noted typical city costs to replace municipal street signs across the corridor at roughly $30,000 and an estimated $200,000 to change 11 Caltrans freeway/guide signs.
Public comment: The public hearing included many speakers on both sides. Supporters said Cesar Chavez’s work advancing farmworkers’ rights and his local ties merit city recognition. Opponents raised pragmatic concerns about business and resident costs to update licenses, bank accounts, printed materials and digital listings; some also said available city funds should be prioritized for infrastructure repairs like sewers and potholes.
Council action and next steps: Vice Mayor Kohr moved that the city prepare an application to the Planning Commission for the H Street renaming and direct staff to include a final fiscal analysis, a more detailed location/scope and a community‑engagement strategy. The motion passed by voice vote; recorded responses were: Vice Mayor Kohr — yes; Councilmember Arias — yes; Councilmember Gonzales — yes; Councilmember Weir — no; Councilmember Smith — yes; Councilmember Komen — no; Councilmember Basharash — no. City staff said the Planning Commission is the approving body and will hold a noticed hearing; notices will go to affected residents and businesses and to partner agencies including USPS, county elections, major utilities and emergency responders.
What the city flagged as potential impacts: Staff recommended preparing materials that explain the process and effects for residents (for example, driver’s license and voter‑registration requirements) and businesses (business licenses, permits, insurance, printed materials and signage). Staff estimated a range for small‑business printing and signage updates at about $500–$3,000, with some outliers substantially higher; examples exist of individual sign replacements costing $10,000–$15,000. The council instructed staff to return with options; staff will produce a scope of alternatives and cost estimates before the Planning Commission hearing.
Context: Staff said many U.S. cities have adopted Cesar Chavez street names and that the average length of renamed streets elsewhere ranges from one to three miles. The project will proceed through the Planning Commission notification and hearing process; the council’s direction to prepare an application does not itself change any postal addresses or official records.
