Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Conroe to act on Collier Point development, citing flooding, narrow roads and infrastructure strain
Summary
Two residents asked the council to halt or re-evaluate the Collier Point development, alleging inadequate hydrological study, narrow roads, flooding risk and infrastructure/service concerns; the council invited staff to follow up and said the matter could be placed on a future agenda.
Residents raised concerns at the Sept. 11 Conroe City Council meeting about a proposed development at Collier Point, asking council and staff to review drainage, lot sizes, road widths and infrastructure capacity before the project proceeds.
Carrie Smith, who said she lives near the Collier Point area, described narrow local roads (she said Rabie Owen is about 16 to 16.5 feet wide in parts of the neighborhood), recurring flooding and what she characterized as an absence of a hydrological study supporting the development plan. Smith told the council she observed wildlife in the area and said existing infrastructure has been strained in recent freezes and periods without water.
"It's going to flood over there," Smith said in public comment, and she urged the council to "shut this down" or otherwise intervene. She told council she and neighbors had presented videos and documentation to city staff and that an engineer showed aerial imagery and had said the site appeared flat despite residents' concerns.
Mayor and council members responded that staff would speak with Smith after the meeting and consider placing the matter on a future agenda if staff cannot resolve the concerns informally. A council member suggested the appropriate next step could be to schedule an agenda item for formal discussion at a subsequent meeting.
Why it matters: neighbors said the proposed development could affect existing residences through increased flooding, changed traffic patterns and pressure on utilities and roads; those are matters that can require engineering review, permitting conditions or council policy decisions.
What the council said it would do: staff and council indicated they would meet with the resident after the meeting to gather details and evaluate whether to add the item to a future agenda for fuller council consideration.
Ending: No formal council action was taken during the Sept. 11 meeting; staff follow-up and potential future agenda placement were the only next steps recorded in the meeting transcript.
