Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South Salt Lake staff propose multi-million-dollar budget transfers into transportation and RDA housing funds
Summary
South Salt Lake staff presented proposed budget changes on Aug. 13 that would shift millions between the city’s general, capital and Transportation Utility funds and move housing-development dollars into the Redevelopment Agency to improve tracking and spend authority.
South Salt Lake staff presented proposed budget amendments at the Aug. 13 City Council work meeting that would move several million dollars between city funds to align revenues and spending and to place some housing development dollars under the Redevelopment Agency (RDA).
Crystal, a city staff member, told the council the amendments are “mainly housekeeping, for the most part,” and described five principal changes: a $6,588,500 transfer from the general fund to the Transportation Utility Fund to reallocate previously restricted Class C funds; a $6,340,499 transfer from the capital fund to the Transportation Utility Fund to move highway and road-restricted dollars; a $1,000,000 transfer from the capital fund into the RDA housing fund to support an affordable housing program; a $2,000,000 transfer from the capital fund to an RDA HTRZ fund to support initial development in the HTRZ zone; and recognition of $2,600,000 in transportation utility fees, which staff said would allow the city to pick up bridge projects including reconstruction work on the 200 and 300 East bridges.
The staff presentation framed the transfers as accounting and project-tracking changes: class C and highway/road revenues previously held as restricted balances in the general or capital funds would be housed in the Transportation Utility Fund so they can be spent on street projects. Crystal said the move would allow those monies “to be used for street projects.”
No formal motion or vote occurred in the work session. Council members did not take action; staff presented the package for discussion and said the items will be brought back through the city’s formal budget/amendment process for possible approval. The amendments as presented modify both fund balances and planned capital spending and would be implemented only if approved in subsequent formal actions.
What happened next: the council paused the work session and moved on to the next agenda item; staff will return with formal ordinance or amendment language and any necessary agenda items for future council consideration.
