Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tulare County assessment board accepts Amazon property value; approves stipulations and dismisses several nonappearances
Summary
The Tulare County Assessment Appeals Board accepted the applicant valuation for Amazon.com Services, LLC after a closed-session review, approved stipulated assessment changes for Patterson Logistics and Saputo Cheese, dismissed a duplicate filing and denied several appeals for nonappearance, and accepted the withdrawal calendar.
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Tulare County Assessment Appeals Board accepted the applicant’s valuation for Amazon.com Services, LLC and carried a series of procedural motions at a hearing that included stipulations, dismissals and multiple denials for nonappearance.
Board action on the Amazon appeal followed a closed-session review of materials submitted by the applicant and the county. After that review the board voted to accept the applicant’s building valuation of $126,419,520 and a total assessed value of $134,400,000 for the property identified in the file as Amazon.com Services, LLC (application referenced in the record). The board said it gave greater weight to market-derived capitalization-rate evidence than to a construction-cost approach.
The board also approved stipulated changes in assessment values the assessor presented for multiple Patterson Logistics Services, Inc. filings and for Saputo Cheese and Protein, LLC, and it dismissed what the board characterized as a duplicate filing for Saburo Cheese USA. Several calendar items were denied for nonappearance, and the board accepted the withdrawal calendar as presented.
Why it matters: The Amazon decision and the signed stipulations resolve large-value assessment questions that affect taxable value records for Tulare County and may affect future commercial assessment disputes. The denials for nonappearance illustrate the board’s enforcement of hearing attendance rules.
What the board decided and how it voted - Amazon.com Services, LLC (continued hearing): After closed-session review the board accepted the applicant’s building valuation of $126,419,520 and a total assessed value of $134,400,000. The board cited capitalization-rate evidence as more representative of current market value than the lower rate advocated by the opposing party. (Motion moved and seconded; outcome: approved.)
- Patterson Logistics Services, Inc. (stipulations): The board accepted stipulations read into the record that adjusted land, structural, fixed-improvement and personal-property values across several application numbers (listed in the record) producing net taxable values the assessor presented (examples in the hearing record include net taxable values of $14,004,995; $15,523,457; $15,386,007.76; and $16,428,002.41). (Motion moved and seconded; outcome: approved.)
- Saputo Cheese and Protein, LLC (stipulation): The board accepted a stipulation adjusting land, structural and fixed-improvement values and personal property, with a net taxable value presented in the record as $121,532,669. (Motion moved and seconded; outcome: approved.)
- Saburo Cheese USA (duplicate filing): The board moved to dismiss the application as a duplicate filing. (Motion moved and seconded; outcome: dismissed.)
- Denials for nonappearance: The board moved to deny the following applications for failure to appear: Ayres Commercial Properties (application 202400010); Berrigan (application 202400001); ATR Properties Inc. (application 202400006); Gerbax R and Rajni Marwa (application 202300206); and Syshiva LLC (application 202300218). (Each motion moved and seconded; outcomes: denied for nonappearance.)
- Withdrawal calendar: The board accepted the withdrawal calendar as presented. (Motion moved and seconded; outcome: accepted.)
Discussion and reasoning Board members said the Amazon matter involved an unusually large and complex property for Tulare County and that the record and market evidence supported acceptance of the applicant’s capitalization-rate approach over the lower rate advocated by the opposing side. The chair noted the county and applicant had provided additional materials requested at the prior session; the board went into closed session to review those materials before resuming open session and moving on the motion. The assessor’s office read multiple stipulated settlements into the record; the board accepted those stipulations without extended debate.
Procedural notes - The board convened, administered the oath to intended testifying parties, and confirmed a quorum before proceeding with the agenda items reported above. - Several agenda items with no appearing representative were denied for failure to appear, per the motions recorded in open session.
What the record does not specify - The chair referred to an agreed land value for the Amazon property during discussion but a single, unambiguous numeric land value was not clearly stated in the transcript excerpt. The transcript contains a clear building value ($126,419,520) and a clear total assessed value ($134,400,000) for the Amazon item.
The board had no other business on the agenda and adjourned after accepting the withdrawal calendar.

