Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents raise traffic, surveillance and fireworks concerns; council explains limits on enforcement
Summary
Public commenters pressed the council about congestion near 50 Second Street, police surveillance towers and fireworks noise. Council and staff said enforcement and regulatory options are limited in some cases and pledged follow-up.
Several residents used the public-comment period at the July 21 meeting to raise safety and quality-of-life concerns for neighborhoods along the 28th Street corridor and around schools, and to ask the council about surveillance technology and fireworks enforcement.
Ted Brasiak of 5308 Mapleside Lane told the council he is concerned about traffic and parking around the school on 50 Second Street, saying parents routinely park in ways he views as hazardous and that temporary barricades and signs have not solved the problem. He asked the city to look at longer-term solutions and said a developer-provided traffic study worried him because he believed it lacked independence.
Matthew Farris of 2905 Sharon Avenue Southwest raised concerns about “police surveillance towers” with strobing lights, license-plate readers at intersections and a pattern of helicopter patrols. Farris said the visible surveillance infrastructure makes him uneasy and asked what standards govern installation of towers and cameras.
Tamara Paul asked whether the council had followed up on requests from the previous meeting about changing rules and times for July 4 fireworks. City staff and the city attorney responded that state law significantly limits the city's ability to regulate consumer fireworks. City staff and the attorney also said enforcement is difficult because officers often cannot locate the person discharging fireworks after the fact.
“State law preempted us,” the city attorney Greg said, noting a 2018 revision of the local ordinance and state-level changes that legalized commercial fireworks and constrained municipal authority. City staff and councilmembers acknowledged the noise and animal-safety concerns residents described but said the combination of state preemption and enforcement practicality limits local options.
Councilmembers asked staff to follow up with residents who raised specific neighborhood safety concerns. Several members said they would be willing to meet with residents and staff to explore traffic mitigation in the 50 Second Street area.
