Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elk Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carson City advisory board reviews proposed elk species management plan and new population baseline
Summary
Members discussed Nevada Department of Wildlife materials proposing 2025 population estimates as the new baseline for tag allocation and noted likely small, localized shifts in future tag numbers; board asked for clearer charts and flagged possible public questions.
Carson City County Advisory Board to Manage Wildlife members reviewed a proposed elk species management plan that uses 2025 population estimates as the new baseline for future tag-allocation decisions.
Board members said the Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW) is replacing older baseline estimates with its 2025 population and survey results when calculating harvest objectives and tag allocations for elk unit groups. Chair Beamer explained the shift to the 2025 estimates and said the change is intended to provide a more current starting point for applying management goals.
The change emerged from NDOW materials showing winter survey counts and population estimates for multiple unit groups. Board members said they expect the updated baseline to cause small decreases in cow harvest tags in some units while producing potential increases in tag numbers in heavily populated units such as 111–115 and 221–223 (Ely/Panaca area) where survey counts were larger. The board heard that the department’s recommended allocations are likely to look similar to 2023 levels overall, but that some unit-level adjustments should be expected once the new baseline is applied.
Members discussed biological context raised in NDOW materials, including efforts to recalculate carrying capacity for habitat areas and competing impacts from unmanaged populations of wild horses and burros. The board noted that such competing ungulate populations could affect elk carrying capacity and therefore influence long-term management goals.
Board members asked for clearer presentation of the tables and charts in NDOW’s packet. Chair Beamer said he had spoken with Cody McKay, the NDOW elk and moose biologist referenced in the packet, and that McKay acknowledged some of the charts could be clarified for public use. The board also noted a recent filled moose tag in the region and the health of Nevada’s elk populations overall.
The board did not take formal action on the plan at this meeting; members framed the discussion as an informational review and asked that NDOW clarify figures and be prepared for public questions when the plan appears on the commission agenda.
