Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Large Scale Infill And Massing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BAR defers review of large mixed‑use proposal at 211 South King and 4 South Street to Oct. 8 after design and scale concerns
Summary
The board deferred a multi‑building mixed‑use proposal that drew concern about massing and height; members asked the applicant for revised massing, clearer use intent and additional design simplification before the next BAR review.
The Leesburg Board of Architectural Review deferred consideration of a proposed L‑shaped mixed‑use project that would occupy 211 South King Street and 4–6 South Street to the Oct. 8 BAR work session after an extended Aug. 6 discussion focused on massing, height and contextual fit.
Staff and members said the revised submission reduced height and altered roof forms from an earlier submission, but remained out of scale with the small, older structures that currently line King Street. Preservation staff recommended further reductions or design changes to break massing into smaller, more residential‑scaled components, and flagged an awkward center dormer and an area that reads like a linked block rather than distinct building masses.
Board member comments and written guidance from a member not present (Tom O’Neill) requested overall project reduction by one story and recommended redesigning to provide a subservient hyphen or lower link between King Street–facing sections and the taller elements further from the street. Staff also urged the applicant to address frontage treatment and the visual effect of ground‑level parking areas that would expose vehicle noses beyond the building face.
Public comment from Rick Brown, a neighboring property owner who recused himself from official review of this case, raised concerns about easement and access for adjacent properties and asked the board to keep the public comment period open.
After deliberation the BAR voted to defer the application to Oct. 8 and requested additional materials including simplified massing alternatives, clarified proposed uses (residential vs. office above first floor), and more detailed sections showing how the project steps down toward King Street. The motion to defer passed with four members voting in favor, zero opposed, one recusal and two absences.
Staff and the applicant agreed to coordinate a revised submission schedule and to consider a September business‑meeting briefing if the BAR calendar allows; otherwise the project will return for full review on Oct. 8.
