Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Docket Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hearing examiner approves notice waivers, grants multiple continuances and acknowledges withdrawals on MDC docket

5587942 · August 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Aug. 14 hearing the examiner approved short waivers of the 23‑day notice requirement for several petitions, granted numerous continuances for staff or petitioner reasons and acknowledged several petition withdrawals; several items were rescheduled to Aug. 28, Sept. 11 or Oct. 9.

The hearing examiner began the Aug. 14 session by reading and approving a set of short waivers of the MDC 23‑day notice requirement for multiple petitions; staff explained the delays were caused by late docketing and supported waivers ranging from one to three days for eight cases and the examiner approved them on the record.

Throughout the docket the examiner granted continuances for cause at staff or petitioner request. Notable continuances and withdrawals recorded on Aug. 14 include:

- 2025 MOD 17 (405, 409 and 411 South Shortridge Road, Warren Township, Council District 20): petitioner requested an extension to Oct. 9, 2025; examiner granted a continuance to 10/09/2025 and required amended notice.

- 2025 MOD 018 (560 North College Avenue, Washington Township, Council District 2): petitioner Overdose Lifeline withdrew the petition and requested a partial refund; staff supported a partial refund amount noted in the staff remarks as $15.73; the hearing record reflects that the examiner acknowledged the withdrawal and granted a refund (the transcript contains inconsistent numeric references to the refund amount; the record should be checked in the office file for the official figure).

- 2025 ZON 062 (57095 Points Road and 7340 East Edgewood Avenue, Franklin Township, Council District 25): continued to 09/11/2025 to allow further traffic-impact study review; petitioner had no objection.

- 2025 ZON 079 (Moller Road, Pike Township): petitioner withdrew the petition; examiner acknowledged withdrawal.

- 2025 ZON 080 (3350 North German Church Road, Warren Township, Council District 15): continued to 08/28/2025 after staff sent new notice reflecting an amendment to acreage.

- 2025 ZON 081 (Old Trails Road, Warren Township, Council District 20): petitioner withdrew and withdrawal was acknowledged.

- 2025 CZN 830 & 2025 CVR 830 (West Tenth Street area): continued to 08/28/2025 to allow review of an amended site plan adding parcels; staff supported notice.

- 2025 CZN 832 & 2025 CVR 832 (East 40th Street area): continued to 09/11/2025; petitioner and staff indicated variances might be required and new notice could be necessary.

- 2025 CZN 837 & 2025 CVR 837 (South Glen Arm Road): continued to 09/11/2025 with notice after a change from D3 to D5 required new notice.

- 2025 CZN 836 & 2025 CAP 836 (4035 Meadows Parkway and 4195 Millersville Road): continued to 09/11/2025 (petitioner requested no new notice); this companion pair concerns a crematorium use and the petitioner said more community engagement was needed.

- 2025 APP 003 (620 East 21st Street): continued to 08/28/2025 without notice to allow staff to review recently submitted documents.

- 2025 CZN 839 & 2025 CPL 839 (222 Hillside Avenue): continued to 09/11/2025 at the request of a councilor and neighborhood association; petitioner did not object.

- Staff also requested continuance of 2025 ZON 082 (1544 East Tenth Street, Center Township) to 08/28/2025 after the petitioner did not appear; the examiner granted the continuance.

The examiner repeatedly advised petitioners and remonstrators of appeal rights under MDC rules and set deadlines for commitments to be submitted before the MDC meeting dates. Several continuances required new public notice; the examiner noted which rescheduled hearings would require amended notice and which would not.