Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Naming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Armstrong renaming: district recommends keeping current name after survey; proposes display to honor Kennedy legacy
Summary
Following a two-week survey, district staff recommended retaining the current Armstrong High School name while adding a plaque and display to honor Kennedy High School’s legacy; staff reported 376 total responses and said most current students and staff favored keeping the name.
Richmond Public Schools recommended that Armstrong High School retain its current name after a district-conducted survey of students, staff, alumni, parents and community members. The administration also proposed placing a plaque and display at Armstrong’s front entrance to honor the legacy of Kennedy High School.
Staff said the survey window ran Sept. 10–25 and produced 376 online responses, with 55% of those responses coming from current students and staff. The district reported that 70% of the students who responded wanted the name to remain the same; alumni and community respondents favored honoring Kennedy’s legacy, and the administration said 66% of alumni and community respondents supported preserving Kennedy’s legacy through recognition at the school.
The administration told the board the recommendation to retain the Armstrong name was driven primarily by the current student and staff responses and that the proposed compromise — retain Armstrong as the school name while installing a dedicated plaque and display to honor Kennedy — was intended to acknowledge both histories. Staff acknowledged that alumni participation in the survey was lower than desired and said they had limited time (a two-week window) to collect responses before the Oct. meeting.
Trustees expressed differing views about the weight given to current student/staff responses versus alumni and community sentiment. Several trustees asked staff to continue outreach and noted the board would have further opportunity to consider the issue at a future meeting; staff confirmed there was at least another month before any formal board action would be taken.
Speakers and participants named in the presentation included central-office staff who ran the survey and trustees who asked follow-up questions. The administration recommended the plaque and display be installed and to continue community engagement before a final action vote.
