Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council upholds planning commission denial of proposed transitional living home on Oakey Boulevard
Summary
Council unanimously upheld a Planning Commission denial of a special use permit for a proposed community/transitional residence at 1821 E. Oakey Blvd., citing minimum separation requirements and concentration of similar uses nearby.
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Las Vegas City Council on Sept. 17 denied an appeal and upheld the Planning Commission’s decision to deny a special use permit for a proposed community residence at 1821 East Oakey Boulevard.
The applicant, represented by Tammy Bass and Dr. Akeen of Progressive Psychiatric Services, sought approval to operate a community residence that would provide transitional housing and clinic services for adults with substance‑use and co‑occurring behavioral health needs. The applicant said the state had certified the clinic and that residents are screened and engaged in structured programs.
Why it matters: Staff and the planning commission concluded the request failed to meet the city’s minimum separation standards for community residences. Staff reported the proposed location is approximately 555 feet from an existing community residence where the minimum required separation is 660 feet. Planning staff recommended denial; the Planning Commission denied the permit and the council voted to uphold that denial.
Public testimony: The applicant presented residents who described treatment progress and employment‑oriented services, and pleaded for time to transition current residents if the permit could not be approved. Councilwoman Olivia Diaz said she supports treatment services but expressed concern about concentration of similar uses in that neighborhood and the impacts on nearby residents.
Council action: Councilwoman Diaz moved to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission’s denial; the motion passed.
Next steps: The applicant may pursue alternative locations or proposals that meet separation standards and community compatibility requirements; council members encouraged the applicant to work with staff and council to find suitable locations for the service.

