Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic Resources Board finds Hauser & Wirth proposal at 201 Hamilton Avenue consistent with Secretary of the Interior standards
Summary
The Palo Alto Historic Resources Board voted 5-0 to find that proposed exterior changes at 201 Hamilton Avenue — the incoming Hauser & Wirth gallery with bookstore and café — conform with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, while directing consistency on paint and awning fabric color and preferring a wider stripe.
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Palo Alto Historic Resources Board voted unanimously to find that exterior alterations proposed for 201 Hamilton Avenue conform with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.
The finding came after a public hearing in which city staff described a proposal to remove multiple awnings, replace a door opening on Emerson Street to a full‑height entrance, add pendant lights in alcoves, introduce a backlit corner sign, and paint entry alcoves a golden yellow to match awning fabric. Amanda Bridges, a senior architect and project manager at Brereton, represented the applicant and said the gallery operator Hauser & Wirth will include a bookstore and café and is aiming for a “welcoming” street presence that preserves historic elements while accommodating large artwork deliveries.
Board members and staff reviewed the plans in detail, including an applicant option for either a 16‑inch or 9‑inch awning stripe and a staff recommendation that paint color of the alcoves match the awning fabric for consistency. Staff’s written recommendation was that the board recommend to the director of planning and development services that the project conforms with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.
Staff described the site as a downtown commercial property at the corner of Hamilton Avenue and Emerson Street in the downtown neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1909 by T. B. Downing and Sons with later changes to storefronts and awnings; staff noted two existing double‑bay canopies on the Hamilton Avenue facade would be retained. The proposal calls for removing six awnings on the Emerson Street facade and three single‑bay awnings on the Hamilton Avenue facade while keeping the two double‑bay canopies at the far end of Hamilton, replacing the green fabric with new fabric, and installing a replacement door on Emerson Street to accommodate gallery operations.
During discussion board members expressed support for opening transom windows, keeping historic elements, and the project’s potential to enliven downtown. Several members said they preferred the wider 16‑inch awning stripe shown in renderings and supported using the awning fabric swatch as the color sample rather than the paint chip shown in the packet. One board member raised maintenance concerns about light colors such as white and yellow and urged planning for upkeep.
After discussion Board member [name not specified in transcript for mover] moved that the board find the project at 201 Hamilton Avenue to be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The motion carried 5–0 on a recorded roll call: Board member Pease — yes; Board member Willis — yes; Board member Elinskas — yes; Vice Chair Roman — yes; Chair Eagles — yes.
The board’s action was a consistency finding for the historic‑review standards; staff retained authority to forward the recommendation to the director and to work with the applicant on final details such as exact fabric and paint selections. No demolition or major envelope changes beyond the single door alteration were approved in this action.
The applicant team said they will continue to work with staff on final material selections and construction details. The board did not set an additional date for continuation; staff noted that the board could continue to a date certain or specify standards of concern if it found a project inconsistent.

