Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Court Healthcare Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hearing spotlights gap in courthouse medical coverage as bill draws debate
Summary
New York City Council members and health officials clashed over a bill that would require medical clinics in city courthouses, with proponents saying the measure is needed to prevent medical neglect and agencies warning it would be costly and logistically difficult.
Get email alerts on the Court Healthcare Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New York City Council members and health officials clashed over a bill that would require medical clinics in city courthouses, with proponents saying the measure is needed to prevent medical neglect and agencies warning it would be costly and logistically difficult.
Council Member Natasha Williams introduced Intro 98, saying the bill responds to “access to medical care in our city's court facilities” that she described as inconsistent. Williams told the committee that "in March, Soso, just 32 years old, died in a Brooklyn courthouse holding cell," and cited other recent deaths to argue for on-site capacity during court appearances.
Jeanette Merrill, senior assistant vice president for communications and external affairs at New York City Health + Hospitals Correctional Health Services (CHS), told the committee that CHS reviews nightly lists of people in custody scheduled for court and identifies those who need clinician-administered medication before or after court. Merrill said CHS has a presence in courthouses through screening services but does not operate full clinics there.
Merrill summarized CHS’s central objection to Intro 98 in plain terms: “Establishing medical clinics in every New York City court facility would present enormous logistical, operational, and fiscal challenges.” She explained that clinics require particular square footage, ventilation, plumbing and electrical work and private clinical spaces, and that courthouse space is limited. She also said operation of clinics would require a full complement of clinical staff at each site and significant DOC support.
Chelsea Chard, senior adviser at the Department of Correction, described the logistics of court production from DOC’s perspective: “Our court production process starts typically around 5 in the morning,” she said, adding that people in custody are typically provided breakfast and are screened for medical needs before departure and again after return. Chard said transport schedules vary and that people sometimes return to Rikers late in the day.
CHS and DOC witnesses told the committee that medically vulnerable patients typically receive medications before leaving or after returning from court and that, for emergencies in court, officers call 911 and FDNY Emergency Medical Services responds. Merrill said the agencies can reschedule court appearances for clinical reasons and that CHS can identify patients “who need to be brought to clinic before leaving court the next morning or after returning from court that evening.”
Supporters of Intro 98 pressed CHS and DOC on whether availability of on-site clinic space would reduce costly trips to hospital emergency departments and shorten time that people spend waiting in holding cells. Council members argued that even if only a handful of people per year would benefit, the city should provide an on-site clinical option. Council Member Andy Ressler and others sought data on how many clinic appointments are missed and how frequently people are routed from courthouses to hospitals; CHS said it could provide additional data and described a relatively recent improvement in how DOC and CHS share court appearance lists.
CHS also urged coordination with the New York State Office of Court Administration, saying court operations and case processing could be affected by any major infrastructural changes. Merrill warned that inserting a clinic visit as a required step during a court appearance could delay case processing and potentially contribute to longer detention stays.
The committee did not take a vote at the hearing. Council members asked CHS and DOC to provide follow-up data — including numbers of missed clinic appointments, counts of emergency transports originating in courthouses, and current CHS staffing and vacancy figures — and to work with the Office of Court Administration on feasibility. Williams said she introduced the bill to address “gaps that show us where systems fall short” and pressed agencies for clarity on what clinic services Intro 98 is intended to require.
Why it matters: People in custody move regularly between jails, courts and hospitals; council members said that handoffs can cause interruptions in medication and monitoring. City health and correction agencies said existing procedures capture most medical needs before or after court and rely on 911 for in-court emergencies, but committee members said the recorded deaths and ongoing complaints signal a need for better on-site options or faster coordination.
The committee scheduled follow-up requests for data and budgetary estimates from CHS and DOC but made no immediate, binding decision on the bill.

