Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Treatment Maintenance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utility board approves $4 million extension to US Water maintenance contract; chair dissents

5609111 · August 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Riviera Beach Utility Special District board voted to transfer $4 million from existing capital projects and authorize an extension of the city's FGUA piggyback agreement with US Water Services for continued operation and maintenance support at the city's water treatment plant. The measure passed 4-1 with Chair Shirley Lanier dissenting.

The City of Riviera Beach Utility Special District voted to authorize an extension of a piggybacked Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) agreement with US Water Services and transfer $4,000,000 from several capital projects to cover additional maintenance, repairs and equipment purchases for the existing water treatment plant.

The board approved Resolution 19-25UD (motion approved; chair dissenting) after a lengthier-than-usual discussion about the plant's condition, training of city staff and the role of outside contractors. Executive Director Joshua Neiman told the board the funds are needed to complete major repairs at the existing plant and to keep the system operating until the new membrane treatment facility comes online. "As Mr. Miller alluded to, they've completed a wide array of maintenance activities at the water treatment plant," Neiman said, and added that the funds would cover work to get water to and through the filtration portion of the plant.

Why it matters: The board and staff said the repairs address repeated reliability and compliance problems at the aging lime-softening plant, including heavy particulate carryover that has been causing discolored water in the distribution system. Supporters argued that US Water's technical expertise helped the city avoid further regulatory fines and deliver measurable water-quality improvements; opponents warned about reliance on contractors and urged a formal transition plan to return day-to-day operations to city staff.

Details of the transfer: The resolution authorizes transfers totaling $4,000,000 into Project 25031 (USD water treatment plant maintenance) from these projects and amounts as presented to the board: $1,000,000 from Project 23035 (wastewater systems), $500,000 from Project 23037 (water main), $1,000,000 from Project 23043 (lift station communication upgrade), $500,000 from Project 23036 (aerial crossing rehabilitation), $300,000 from Project 23033 (raw water well major maintenance), $250,000 from Project 23038 (water meter replacement), and $450,000 from Project 23044 (citywide road and infrastructure).

Board debate and staff commitments: Several board members said the city has historically underfunded or deferred maintenance at the plant, producing a backlog of repairs. Neiman and other supporters said the amount requested is for equipment and contract maintenance work, not for staff augmentation. Neiman said training for city staff is ongoing and that the utility has started transitioning US Water management responsibilities so city employees increasingly handle operations. He also said US Water's contract extension does not include new staffing augmentations and that major mechanical work to rebuild filters and piping requires specialized contractors.

Concerns: Chair Shirley Lanier said she had "a problem" with the extension and questioned how many contracts US Water had already received and whether staff had been trained sufficiently; she pointed to the cumulative cost of multiple contracts and asked for a clear transition plan. Neiman and other board members committed to produce a written training and transition plan for US Water and to continue hiring direct city leadership, including a water plant manager and compliance staff.

Outcome: The resolution passed with a recorded outcome of approved; Chair Shirley Lanier voted no, and the remaining board members voted yes. No public comment cards were submitted specifically on the item prior to the vote.

Ending: Board members asked staff to deliver a transition plan showing who has been trained, the timeline for reducing contractor oversight, and a clearer description of what work the $4,000,000 will fund ahead of the new plant's startup.