Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs staff to study changes to historic-resource demolition criteria after public concern
Summary
Council asked staff to explore amending the Corona municipal code criteria for approving demolition or relocation of historic resources after public commenters argued that a clause effectively nullified preservation protections.
The Corona City Council directed staff to study potential amendments to the city’s historic-resources ordinance after members of the public and some council members said the existing economic-viability finding undermines preservation efforts.
Planning and development staff told the council the 2001 ordinance establishes criteria for demolition and relocation of properties on Corona’s heritage inventory and Corona Register. Staff reviewed the current criteria and said subsection C — which allows denial of a demolition permit only if denial would deprive the owner of “all economically viable use” of the site — is the focus of the requested change.
Staff explained that modifying that criterion would require a zoning text amendment, a public hearing before the Planning Commission and a council hearing, and that the process could take roughly three to six months depending on workload. The director noted that the historic preservation board now reviews demolition requests for Corona Register properties and that those discretionary reviews will trigger CEQA analysis.
Public speakers said the current economic-viability standard is too permissive and effectively disables preservation. One commenter said, “If we have that phrase that way we don't have a historic resource code,” and urged the council to “put some teeth in this” and to return a revised ordinance promptly. Another speaker warned the city not to tell property owners what they may do without offering to buy at market value; he said the city had declined to purchase the train depot in the past.
Several council members said they support reviewing the code, adding enforcement “teeth” and moving authority to the historic preservation board. The council asked staff to pursue a zone-text amendment and noted the amendment process will include CEQA review and public hearings at the Planning Commission and council.
