Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment Western Edge topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts Western Edge redevelopment amendments despite planning board concerns and ongoing litigation
Summary
The council voted to readopt and amend the Western Edge redevelopment plan, drawing opposition from neighboring municipalities and preservation groups that say the changes favor developers and disregard planning-board recommendations.
The Hoboken City Council voted to adopt amendments to the Western Edge redevelopment plan covering the Jefferson Street and Madison Street subareas after a contested public hearing that drew lawyers for developers and opponents.
Why it matters: The Western Edge redevelopment has been the subject of protracted litigation and settlement agreements. Opponents said the amendments disproportionately benefit private developers and ignore the Hoboken Planning Board’s concerns about increases in lot coverage and setbacks.
Opponents from outside municipalities and a preservation group urged the council to delay adoption while litigation and settlement terms remain unresolved. Maxwell Merker, representing the City of Union City in related litigation, said the changes “directly benefit the private developers with little to no benefit to the people of Hoboken,” pointing to increases in permitted lot coverage and the exclusion of certain projections from the street‑level coverage calculation.
The Palisades Cliffs Protection Alliance argued the amendment lacked contemporaneous studies and warned of conflicts of interest from council members involved in earlier phases of the plan.
Developer counsel responded that the amendments implement previously negotiated settlement terms and that the settlement was conditional; Cameron McLeod, representing the redevelopers, urged the council to adopt the ordinance as part of implementing the settlements.
Council members debated a motion to table the matter for two weeks to allow neighbors and the developer to negotiate adjustments. Councilman Ramos moved to table; the motion was seconded and the council voted on whether to carry the item. After further discussion, the council voted on the ordinance. A recorded vote shows a number of aye votes and several members abstained. The ordinance was adopted, with abstentions recorded by some members.
Planning-board context: The Hoboken Planning Board had recommended against raising lot coverage in the Jefferson and Madison subareas to the levels proposed, calling the changes “excessive and unreasonable,” though the board also found the overall plan amendment consistent with the master plan.
What’s next: Opponents signaled they will continue litigation challenging the settlements and the ordinance; the council and developers said the changes are necessary to implement affordable-housing commitments and to resolve long-running disputes. Council members said they expected the project to proceed with additional design and mitigations to address neighbor concerns.
