Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance Report topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lynchburg City Schools reports September month-end: revenues behind expenditures, $674,595.78 health-insurance shortfall noted

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff reported month-end financials for Sept. 30, 2025: year-to-date revenues of about $20.31 million, revenues collected at 17.05% of original appropriation, expenditures at 21.33% and total expenditures including encumbrances at about 83%. A year-to-date health-insurance deficit of $674,595.78 was reported and described as expected to be

Finance director staff presented the Lynchburg City Schools month-end financial report for Sept. 30, 2025, noting year-to-date revenue and expenditure patterns and a health-insurance deficit the division expects to reconcile during the annual audit.

The presenter, identified in the meeting as Ms. Jamies, said revenues collected year to date totaled $20,311,009.85 and 96 cents and that revenues collected represented roughly 17.05% of the original appropriation. Year-to-date expenditures were 21.33% of the original appropriation. Ms. Jamies said total expenditures inclusive of encumbrances equated to about 83.0% of projected spend, and she reported no new notable variances from the prior month.

Ms. Jamies provided a breakdown of revenue sources: state revenues approximately 19.35% of total collections, federal revenues 18.45%, and local revenues 12.67%. She reported collection rates for miscellaneous and charges for services as roughly 19.81% and 33.27%, respectively.

On insurance, the report showed a year-to-date balance for employee health insurance of negative $674,595.78 that staff expect will be addressed in the district’s 2025 annual audit. Board members questioned the apparent $7 million increase in expenditures compared with the prior year; Ms. Jamies said some contracts were processed earlier in the fiscal year than the prior year and that the variance appeared to be a timing issue tied to expense/revenue lag. She said she was comfortable with the current position “barring any unusual expenses coming down the pike.”

Board members asked whether the city’s contribution had been received; the finance presenter said the city had provided more funds as of Sept. 30 than it had the prior year and that capital-improvement funds for projects such as track work are managed in a separate fund and are “in the queue” to be spent.

No formal board action was taken on the financial report; board members asked follow-up questions and requested continued monitoring.