Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Road 218 Median topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clay County engineers defend median plan for County Road 218 as businesses warn of lost access, safety concerns
Summary
Contractor work on the County Road 218 widening prompted business owners and residents to urge the board to add median openings or change design speeds; engineers said changes now could raise costs, require permit changes and undermine access-management safety goals.
Get email alerts on the County Road 218 Median topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Business owners along County Road 218 urged the Clay County Board of County Commissioners on Sept. 23 to add median openings to a section of the county’s widening project, saying planned raised medians will block customer access and force delivery trucks into dangerous maneuvers.
"We're really for it. I love Middleburg," resident Matthew Wells told the board, but he said the proposed raised median would reduce access to three driveways he owns on County Road 218 and that he feared losing westbound access unless the plan is adjusted. "I certainly don't want to lose my westbound access at any level," he said.
Several nearby business owners described frequent semi and delivery truck traffic and warned that limiting left-turn access would force trucks to make U‑turns in travel lanes. "There's numerous delivery trucks. Semi trucks, trailers, dropping supplies," said Jason Cannon, who owns buildings at 4283 and 4289 Creek Street. "They'll have to get completely in the left-hand side and stop...that's an accident waiting to happen."
County engineers and the project owner’s representative responded that the corridor’s access-management classification and design standards constrained where full median openings could be placed. WGI project engineer Josh Maddox explained the county used anchor points (major side streets) and minimum deceleration lengths when locating median openings. "For a speed limit of 45 miles an hour you're allowed one full median opening every 1,300 feet," Maddox said, noting the design must provide a safe taper and room for queued vehicles.
Engineers outlined four options discussed with staff: make no changes; add a median opening at a specific parcel (which would require reducing the design speed in that segment from 45 to 35 mph and add conflict points); close an existing directional opening and open another closer to the full opening (with mixed impacts); or adopt a different access classification that would allow limited openings but could degrade corridor throughput as traffic volumes grow.
"Adding a new median opening will also increase more conflict points...we would have to reduce the design speed to 35 miles an hour...and it would eliminate the eastbound left turn lane at the full median opening," Maddox told the board. Engineers and transportation staff cautioned that construction is already active and changes now would likely add schedule time and construction costs and may require permit modifications for stormwater or additional impervious coverage.
Transportation Program Administrator Ed Dendor said any change could range in cost "anywhere from $50,000 to $200,000" depending on option and contractor responses and that Anderson Columbia — the contractor — is actively building curb and base materials in the area. Dendor said staff would seek prices from the contractor and evaluate permitting impacts, but warned against ad hoc stop-work orders because of potential contractor claims for delay.
Several commissioners urged staff to return with a cost and schedule analysis and to re-check permit impacts. Commissioner Reininger and others noted that planning for the corridor had stretched across decades and that building roads before development often proved the best way to avoid such conflicts.
What happens next
Staff agreed to obtain contractor pricing and a permit-impact analysis for the board to consider at a follow-up meeting. If the board directs a design change, staff said it would need to work with the contractor on price and schedule adjustments and, if required, file permit modifications with regulators.
Provenance (evidence excerpts)
- Public comment: Matthew Wells on access concerns (transcript 3464.8901–3576.66). reason_code:topicintro - Public comment: Jason Cannon on deliveries and semis (transcript 3661.98–3741.95). reason_code:topicintro - Staff explanation: Josh Maddox, WGI, description of access-management criteria and options (transcript 8452.095–8984.795). reason_code:topicintro
Speakers (attributions used in article)
- Josh Maddox — Highway engineer, WGI (consultant) — presented access-management criteria and described options. - Ed Dendor — Transportation Program Administrator, Clay County — summarized options, schedule and cost implications. - Carlos Campos — Project manager, WGI — attended and fielded engineer questions. - Richard Smith — County engineer, Clay County — participated in discussion of construction status. - Matthew Wells — Middleburg resident and property owner — public commenter on access concerns. - Jason Cannon — Business owner (addresses 4283/4289 Creek Street) — public commenter on truck deliveries and safety concerns. - Jennifer Waldron — Business owner in complex on County Road 218 — public commenter describing high customer volumes and delivery traffic.
Clarifying details
- Design rule cited: typical access management limit ~one full median opening every 1,300 feet at 45 mph; deceleration and taper lengths dictate location of openings (staff explanation). - Temporary construction impact: contractor Anderson Columbia had curb and base in place in the affected segment; changes would affect schedule and potentially add cost and require stormwater/permit revisions (transportation staff estimate). - Cost range: staff estimated order-of-magnitude change costs from tens to a few hundreds of thousands of dollars depending on option and contractor pricing.
Meeting context
- Engagement level: multiple public commenters (business owners and residents) raised specific operational and safety concerns; county staff and consultant provided technical options and caveats about permitting and schedule. - Implementation risk: medium–high if board orders design changes during active construction due to potential contractor claims and permitting consequences.
Searchable tags: ["County Road 218","median","access management","WGI","Anderson Columbia","traffic safety","Middleburg"]
Salience: overall 0.72 — corridor work affects local businesses, trucking/delivery logistics and long-term traffic flow for eastern-western travel across Clay County.
