Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homelessness Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Summerville councilors question cost-share for Lowcountry rapid housing plan; request more details before committing
Summary
Charleston's mayor asked regional partners to share startup and operating costs for a rapid housing facility; staff said the proposed formula would make Summerville's share about $361,000 startup and $100,000 annually, and councilors raised concerns about distance, population allocation fairness, and the facility's target population (men only).
Councilors and staff discussed a regional request from Charleston's mayor to participate in a Lowcountry rapid housing program that would provide housing and wraparound services for unhoused individuals, but members said they need clearer cost allocations and operational details before committing funds.
Staff summarized figures presented at a prior regional briefing: estimated startup costs of about $5.5 million and first-year operating (O&M) costs of about $1.5 million. Based on the population-driven formula shared with the town, staff said Summerville's share would be approximately $361,000 of startup costs and $100,000 annually for operations. "Their startup costs are estimating at about 5 and a half million dollars and then a million and a half, o and m costs in the first year or the second year of operations," staff said. "Based on the formulas... Summerville's share of the start up cost would be $361,000 and then a $100,000 annual o and m contribution."
Councilors raised several concerns. Some argued the proposed population-based allocation penalizes smaller communities with less revenue per resident. Others noted the facility as described would be located on the Peninsula adjacent to Charleston's public works site (near Milford Street) and that the proposal, as presented, targeted men only, not families or women. One councilor observed that leaving out families and children would omit a vulnerable segment of the unhoused population.
Councilors said the issue is regional and merits coordination but asked for clearer cost breakdowns, allocation methodology and assurances about who the facility would serve before committing funds. One councilor suggested the town express regional support for exploring solutions but withhold financial commitments until the costs and formula are clarified.
Next steps: Staff will relay Summerville's concerns back to the regional organizers and request more detailed cost allocations and operational plans before the town makes any financial commitment.
