Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Liquor Store Distance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gallatin committee advances ordinance to remove distance limits for liquor licenses after split votes
Summary
After public comment and extended debate, the Gallatin City Council Committee voted to send an ordinance to city council that would remove distance restrictions between liquor stores; the committee earlier voted to advance a separate half-mile proposal before later moving to remove all distance limits.
Vice Mayor Hayes and the Gallatin City Council Committee voted on Aug. 26 to ask staff to prepare an ordinance that would remove the city istance restriction between licensed liquor stores, sending the proposal on to the full City Council for final action.
The item followed extensive public comment in favor of loosening the rule from residents in District 5 and other parts of Gallatin, and lengthy discussion among council members about the legal mechanics and market effects of changing the city lcohol rules.
The discussion began with public commenters including Cam Patel, who said he wanted to open a liquor store in District 5 and asked the council to reduce the current one-mile distance requirement. Patel said, "We don't have any liquor store. So we open it," and asked the council to change the distance to a half mile. Several residents, including Debbie Upchurch, Mary Harper and others, told the committee they supported Patel's request.
Staff and council members cautioned that measurement and enforcement of a distance rule had been a recurring administrative challenge. A staff member, identified in the meeting as Ms. Kittrell, described past difficulty reconciling driving-distance measurements and GIS radii and noted the city had moved from a population-based cap to a one-mile radius in recent years.
Council members debated multiple approaches: leaving the one-mile radius, reducing it to a half mile, or removing the distance limit entirely and relying on zoning and other city code requirements. A motion to change the distance to a half mile was made and seconded; the committee recorded that council members Jones, Carter and Alexander voted in favor, Councilman Gervontz and Vice Mayor Hayes voted no, and Councilmen Fan and Fennell abstained. The committee then sent that half-mile proposal to council for placement on a resolution.
Shortly afterward, Councilman Gervontz moved to remove the distance restriction altogether; that motion was seconded and passed on a roll call. The roll call recorded four ayes (Councilmen Alexander, Carter, Jones and Jugontz), one no (Vice Mayor Hayes) and two abstentions (Councilmen Fan and Fennell). The committee instructed staff to prepare an ordinance reflecting removal of the distance restriction and to place it on the next City Council agenda.
Council members voiced differing policy rationales. Supporters said the change would allow retail options in parts of the city that lack them, particularly District 5. Opponents and some members expressed concern about undermining protections for earlier investors and about administrative complexity. One council member said an investor had told him reducing the distance to a half mile would cause that investor to withdraw a planned $12 million to $13 million project.
The committee emphasized that removing the distance restriction would not eliminate zoning or other city code requirements for retail businesses; any liquor store still must locate in a zoning district that permits retail sales and obtain required state licenses.
The committee directed staff to draft the ordinance and bring it to the City Council for consideration next week. No final change to the city code occurred at the committee meeting; the item will return to the full council for adoption or rejection.
Ending: The committee vote to send an ordinance removing distance restrictions marks a significant procedural step; the full Gallatin City Council will consider the ordinance at its next meeting and could adopt, amend or reject it.
