Coventry staff present statewide transportation review option; outside routing analysis priced at $11,540

5588461 · August 14, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff outlined statewide transportation trends, 'ghost riders,' and a third-party route-verification offer priced at $11,540 to analyze possible efficiencies; the committee did not vote and deferred further discussion.

District staff presented a detailed overview of statewide and local school-transportation trends, framed potential savings opportunities and recommended consideration of a third-party route verification study priced at $11,540.

Why it matters: Transportation is a major and growing line item across Rhode Island school districts while enrollment has declined statewide. The presentation explained how ‘statewide’ transportation, depot stops and so-called “ghost riders” (students who register for a bus but do not ride) affect routing efficiency and cost. Staff recommended an independent routing review to identify potential in-district and interdistrict savings; the committee deferred any vote and asked for the item to return to a future meeting for action.

Key points from staff: Staff said Rhode Island’s statewide routing system has grown more expensive even as student enrollment fell about 15% statewide since 2004. They said some local runs can be cheaper to operate in-district with district vehicles, while other runs are better handled by statewide buses. Staff highlighted a recent example in which Coventry shifted Hendricken private-school transportation onto the statewide system and estimated that move saved roughly $80,000 annually by eliminating a dedicated local bus.

Third-party route verification: The statewide program vendor offered an 11,540-dollar analysis (to be charged as monthly additions to the district’s statewide billing rather than a single upfront invoice) to study Coventry’s routing for potential savings. Staff said the analysis could include both in-district and statewide routing and emphasized that results are uncertain — recommendations could yield significant savings or few changes. Committee members asked whether the proposed study would fix a state-level problem and whether it would cover statewide and local routes; staff replied that the study would analyze Coventry’s use of statewide services as well as in-district routes.

Outcome: The committee did not vote on the $11,540 routing study at this meeting. Staff said the district could place the item on a future agenda for a vote and noted there is no immediate deadline to sign up.

Ending: The committee asked staff to return the item with any additional details about the study’s scope and timing for a future vote.