Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sedgwick County commissioners defer vote on countywide stormwater code amendment
Summary
After a lengthy debate over countywide water-quality and runoff controls, the Board of County Commissioners voted to delay action on amending the Stormwater Management Code for three weeks to allow further briefings and review of the 2016 policy change.
Sedgwick County commissioners voted to defer consideration of an amendment to the county's Stormwater Management Code for three weeks after debate over whether the change would reintroduce countywide stormwater controls rescinded in 2016.
The proposal before the board would restore stormwater quality and quantity requirements across the unincorporated portions of Sedgwick County rather than limit them to the county's urbanized zone. Supporters said the change is needed to reduce erosion, downstream sedimentation and water-quality impacts; critics called it overregulation that could impose time and cost burdens on property owners and developers.
Lynn Packer, director of public works and county engineer, told the commission the current absence of countywide controls lets runoff from new developments flow unchecked onto neighboring properties and into county infrastructure. "We're having a lot of erosion issues outside of our subdivisions in the unincorporated areas of the county," Packer said. "Those erosions are coming at the expense of neighboring properties as well as the county infrastructure." She described one typical regulatory requirement used inside the urbanized zone: detention ponds sized to hold, and slowly release, storm runoff so sediment settles before discharge. "The regulations would require that pond to be sized appropriately to be able to hold, for 24 hours, a...10‑year storm," Packer said, adding the design often includes a rock or concrete weir to meter outflow rather than allowing free flow.
Commissioner Howe, who requested the item be removed from consent for discussion, stressed the policy history and his concerns about reversing the board's 2016 decision. "We had a very robust discussion in 2016... We made a very thoughtful decision in 2016," Howe said, urging more review of past maps and the trade-offs between regulation and private costs. Commissioner Reinschner said he recalled the earlier workshop and was open to moving forward with more information: "If we need to have another repeat of exactly what we saw at the last one plus the new information... then we'll do another staff meeting."
Chairman Beatty proposed handling follow-up through staff and suggested commissioners who want a deeper briefing contact county staff directly for a one‑on‑one or small group review. Ultimately the board approved a motion to defer consideration for three weeks; the motion was seconded and passed on roll call.
The deferral keeps the 2016 approach in effect for now while staff prepares additional briefing material and background maps the commissioners requested. Commissioners and staff indicated they plan to schedule follow-up meetings and provide more historical context before the item returns to the board agenda.
Clarifying details: commissioners said the 2016 action had narrowed stormwater requirements to certain properties inside the urbanized zone; the current proposal would apply the county's quality and quantity standards to all unincorporated areas, affecting how developers size detention ponds and the hydraulic controls used before discharge. Staff cited ongoing erosion, sedimentation and impacts to downstream wells and infrastructure as reasons to restore countywide standards.
The board did not take a final vote on the code amendment; the item was deferred for three weeks.
