Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves first reading to rezone Edgewood Estates lots for six-house subdivision; questions about Corps easement and cul‑de‑sac raised

5573832 · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Highland Village City Council on Aug. 12 voted 7–0 to approve the first reading of an ordinance to rezone Lots 1 and 2, Block B, Edgewood Estates (234 Edgewood Drive) to allow subdivision into six lots.

The Highland Village City Council on Aug. 12 voted 7–0 to approve the first reading of an ordinance to rezone Lots 1 and 2, Block B, Edgewood Estates (commonly known as 234 Edgewood Drive) from single‑family SF‑12 to a planned development overlay with an SF‑10 base. The change would allow the property owner to subdivide the 4.138‑acre parcel into six lots (five new homes plus an existing home), subject to preliminary and final plat approvals.

At the planning-and-zoning level the proposal was unanimously recommended (5–0). One resident, Jimmy Bassinger of 210 Edgewood Drive, addressed the council in support and said the proposed plat “finishes out our neighborhood” and fits the existing character.

Nut graf: Why this matters — Rezoning and subdivision will change lot patterns along Edgewood Drive and required council scrutiny about public‑safety access, storm/flood easements, and how new lots will comply with flood‑elevation and setback rules.

Council members and staff discussed four requested exceptions to subdivision standards: allowing a cul‑de‑sac length greater than 600 feet (existing Edgewood already exceeds 600 feet), permitting asphalt street section instead of standard concrete curb-and-gutter, continuing a rural bar‑ditch drainage section without sidewalks and foregoing curb-and-gutter to match existing drainage patterns. Several council members asked whether additional fire hydrants or a larger cul‑de‑sac turning radius would be required; the fire chief (on record) said hydrant spacing and an adequate turn radius are the primary safety considerations.

A substantive planning constraint discussed at length was the Corps of Engineers’ 537‑foot elevation contour (a lake easement tied to Lake Lewisville). Staff and council noted that the Corps easement limits permanent structures, plumbing and certain filling within the contour, and building foundations typically must be above a minimum elevation (city code and floodplain rules require elevated foundations above mapped freeboard). Staff said the preliminary concept was drawn to preserve buildable area on Lots 3 and 5 but that the developer must coordinate with the Corps and provide elevation certificates and plat documentation.

Ending: The council approved the zoning amendment on first reading 7–0; staff asked the applicant to return with preliminary and final plats showing detailed grading, any required additional hydrants or drainage adjustments, and documentation of Corps easement coordination before final plat approval.