Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Waste And Recycling topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors discuss enforcement and camera upgrades for rural recycling drop sites

5497580 · July 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members and staff debated enforcement, camera capability and options for rural drop-site recycling; action items include checking neighboring counties’ setups and Brody evaluating camera options.

Winnebago County supervisors spent substantial time on July 29 reviewing concerns about rural recycling drop sites — including improper dumping, enforcement limits and camera quality — and identified next steps to address abuse of the bins.

Why it matters: The county changed its recycling approach and residents have raised questions about service, costs and illegal dumping. Poor compliance and "abuse" of drop sites has created extra workload for the county’s contractor and staff.

Key points from the discussion - Citizen questions: A landowner asked how much the county is saving by moving from curb service (Waste Management) to bins, how the extra money is being used, whether the county has surveyed taxpayer satisfaction, whether Thompson residents may use the bins, whether businesses may use them, and whether bins can be emptied more frequently. - Cost and satisfaction: County staff said annual costs with Waste Management were rising and staff had estimated savings in the range referenced in the meeting (staff said figures such as "44 to 50,000" when discussing comparisons). Staff also said they had not completed a formal satisfaction study and that a portion of residents appear satisfied based on informal contacts. - Abuse and enforcement: Board members and staff described repeated dumping of household garbage, furniture and other non-recyclables that overburdens the county’s contract holder. The board has posted restrictions and purchased cameras to deter abuse; camera resolution and angle have limited the ability to identify license plates or clearly see what is dumped. - Camera options and cost: Staff reported the currently deployed solar trailer camera has limited resolution at the distances required and estimated high-quality license-plate-capable cameras would cost more than $1,000–$1,500 plus installation and a reliable power/connection. Brody (staff) has a call into the company that installed the county’s cameras and will report back on options; staff also will check specifications for cameras used by other counties (Susan and Worth County were cited as contacts). - Operational rules: The board reiterated that businesses are not allowed to use the residential drop-site bins; residents may still arrange private curb pickup with Waste Management at their own expense.

Actions and next steps recorded - Staff to contact Worth County and Hancock County for comparisons of drop-site setups and costs. - Brody to evaluate camera upgrades and report recommended specifications and estimated costs. - Staff and the board will consider whether a higher-resolution camera, different mounting (pole rather than trailer), or re-orienting the trailer could provide a clearer view for enforcement.

Ending: The board asked to re-place the topic on a future agenda after staff follows up with camera vendors and neighboring counties and returns cost and operational analyses.