Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Votes And Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves food‑service equipment, annual salary schedules, MOUs and temporary interfund transfer resolutions

5458506 · July 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees approved a set of consent and action items including food‑service equipment purchases, salary schedules for 2025–26, several teacher‑preparation MOUs and routine temporary interfund transfer resolutions for cash flow. All motions passed by unanimous roll call.

At the July meeting trustees approved several action items and routine resolutions. Below is a concise “votes at a glance” summary of the formal motions recorded during the meeting.

What the board approved (motions and vote summaries) 1) Consent agenda (district) — Approved - Motion: Approve the consent agenda as presented. - Vote: Peter — Yes; Ken — Yes; Shane — Yes; James — Aye; (fifth trustee) — Yes. - Outcome: Approved (unanimous roll call).

2) 14.2 Food service equipment purchases — $276,241 (fund 13) — Approved - Motion: Award contracts for food service equipment to Avanti, Central Restaurant Products and Hubert per the RFB and spending plan. - Fiscal note: Purchases funded from Food Service Fund (Fund 13); total shown in staff report $276,241. - Vote: Peter — Yes; Ken — Yes; Shane — Yes; James — Aye; (fifth trustee) — Yes. - Outcome: Approved (unanimous roll call).

3) 14.3 2025–26 salary schedules (A–C) — Approved - Motion: Approve district salary schedules for the 2025–26 year (administrators, confidential staff, CSEA and adult education schedules) to be effective while negotiations continue. - Note: No district salary changes were adopted in the packet; administrators’ schedule was split to separate county and district administrator positions. - Vote: Peter — Yes; Ken — Yes; Shane — Yes; James — Aye; (fifth trustee) — Yes. - Outcome: Approved (unanimous roll call).

4) 14.4 Resolution ACUSD 25‑26 — Temporary interfund transfer (district) — Approved - Motion: Adopt the annual resolution authorizing temporary interfund borrowing under Education Code provisions for cash‑flow purposes. - Vote: Peter — Yes; Ken — Yes; Shane — Yes; James — Aye; (fifth trustee) — Yes. - Outcome: Approved (unanimous roll call).

5) 14.5–14.7 MOUs with teacher‑preparation programs — Approved - Agenda items: Memoranda of understanding with Pacific Oaks Education Corporation, California State University East Bay (intern program), and University of Phoenix. - Fiscal notes: No district fiscal obligation in MOUs; University of Phoenix model provides $30/week mentoring payments from the university to district mentoring teachers. - Vote (each MOU): Peter — Yes; Ken — Yes; Shane — Yes; James — Aye; (fifth trustee) — Yes. - Outcome: All MOUs approved (unanimous roll call).

6) County Office consent and county resolution (ACOE temporary interfund transfer) — Approved - Motion (County): Approve the county office consent agenda and adopt the county office temporary interfund transfer resolution for cash‑flow flexibility. - Vote (each): Peter — Yes; Ken — Yes; Shane — Yes; James — Aye; (fifth trustee) — Yes. - Outcome: Approved (unanimous roll call).

Notes and next steps - Food service purchases: staff said the purchases implement a previously presented food‑service spending plan and are financed from the district’s Fund 13; staff plan a fall update to show purchases and progress. - Salary schedules: The board approved schedules to ensure compliance with CalSTRS and CalPERS reporting while negotiations continue; any negotiated increases later would be brought to the board for ratification. - Temporary interfund transfers: Staff said the resolutions provide a standard, legally permitted tool for short‑term cash‑flow borrowing between funds; interest is paid internally to lending funds at the county treasurer rate.

Endnote All recorded votes were unanimous by roll call at the time of each motion; the meeting transcript shows named roll‑call responses for trustees Peter, Ken, Shane and James and an additional affirmative from the fifth trustee recorded as "also yes."