Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Outreach Westland topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Westland feasibility meeting drew community concern over trust, costs and potential hookups to city water
Summary
A county-funded feasibility study and community outreach meeting for Westland generated distrust among residents about top-down solutions, questions about who would pay for connections and calls for bilingual outreach and clearer messaging tied to the Boardman rate study.
Morrow County staff and consultants reported on a feasibility study for the Westland neighborhood and on community outreach after a large August 27 public meeting, saying turnout was high and that door-to-door outreach by West Glen United helped bring residents to the event.
County staff and outreach partners described three consistent concerns from residents: skepticism that officials had already decided a solution, worries about losing privately owned wells or their water use, and uncertainty about who would pay for service laterals and monthly water bills. The county said it will not mandate well abandonment at this stage and emphasized that the feasibility study is meant to evaluate options, not impose a final solution.
The county announced plans to delay the next Westland outreach meeting from October 1 to October 15 so City of Boardman rate study results (scheduled for presentation to the Boardman council Oct. 8) can be included in public discussion. County staff said they will post materials on the county website and on a forthcoming Clean Water Consortium website and will email material to meeting attendees.
Staff also described several operational changes to outreach after the large turnout: moving the October meeting to the Sage Center for more space and technology, increasing Spanish-language accessibility (including possibly flipping the meeting format so Spanish is the primary language with English translation), and tightening Q&A logistics so panelists can answer more questions in a controlled forum.
Why it matters: Residents repeatedly asked for clear, consistent messaging about whether hookups to Boardman’s system would be mandatory and what the monthly cost would be. County and consultant presenters said answers depend on engineering, whether a municipality will take ownership of distribution and on final financing plans — all items still under study. The county also flagged that surveys and preliminary cost figures given to residents can be misunderstood and recommended saying “we don’t know yet” where numbers are not finalized.
Community reaction and next steps: Attendees cited discrepancies between the roadmap material and outreach messaging; county staff committed to improving coordination across agencies and to creating a central information hub. Staff also reported an informal in-meeting survey (about 30 respondents) that leaned pro-connection, but they acknowledged the sample was small. The county said it will provide a finalized feasibility memo to the consortium and the community prior to the October meeting, and will include Department of Health representatives to answer treatment and safe-delivery questions.
Ending: County staff urged continued trust-building through transparent, multilingual materials and asked the consortium to coordinate a single, consistent public message as feasibility work continues and funding strategies are developed.
